WBS Using Principles Of Project Scheduling And Budgeting
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
WBS Using Principles Of Project Scheduling And Budgeting
Please use the project from Assignment 1 to complete this assignment, which requires that you provide the necessary scope for your project.
A project scope includes many variables. The Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) must be defined prior to the start of the project to ensure that all of the details are planned.
Write an eight to ten (8-10) page project charter in which you:
Define the project including the vision, objectives, and scope of the project.
Determine the customers who will use the deliverables produced from the project.
Specify the key stakeholders for this project.
Determine the role and responsibilities of each project team resource. Include the scheduling duration for each resource.
Graphically depict the project organizational structure. Note: Include a screenshot of the image file to show your work.
Create a WBS using principles of project scheduling and budgeting through the use of Excel spreadsheet, Word table, or other similar project-specific software. Next, develop the cost and time estimates and allocate resources where applicable.
Determine the major project milestones and the required delivery dates. Analyze why each milestone is solely critical to the project.
Document the main dependencies, risks, issues, and assumptions of the project. Select the top three (3) most important risks of the project planning and project management process. Suggest strategies to mitigate those risks.
Summarize the project budget approved by the project sponsor.
Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Develop a project plan including the critical elements of project scope, priorities, WBS, and communication plan.
Formulate a WBS using principles of project scheduling and budgeting, and develop cost and time estimates and allocate resources.
Apply the concepts of risk mitigation to the project planning and project management process.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in project management.
Write clearly and concisely about project management using proper writing mechanics.
The U.S. health care delivery system is often described as a kaleidoscope, puzzle, or patchwork quilt—descriptions that emphasize the fact that health care delivery in this country involves multiple, loosely coordinated components, and does not function through one integrated system. The organization and structure of this “system” have a tremendous impact on the delivery of services. As such, health care professionals, consumers, advocates, and policy makers face tough choices with regard to health care costs, quality, and access.
To prepare for this Application Assignment:
Consider how the structure and organization of the U.S. health care system affects delivery of services.
Reflect on the interrelationships between and among health care costs, quality, and access in this country.
Bring to mind a specific example that illustrates potential trade-offs.
To complete this Application Assignment, write a 1- to 2-page paper that addresses a specific situation or issue that illustrates the trade-offs involved in decisions related to cost, quality, and access. Be sure that your paper includes answers to the following questions:
How could current and future efforts to contain costs affect quality and access?
How might measures to ensure the provision of high-quality care influence costs and accessibility?
How could efforts to promote universal access to care impact cost and quality?
How can the structure and organization of the U.S. health care delivery system bring about or impact cost, quality, and access to health care.
Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources as appropriate. Refer to the Essential Guide to APA Style for Walden Students to ensure that your in-text citations and reference list are correct.
Video: Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2009). Context of health care delivery. Baltimore: Author.
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 12 minutes.
In this media program, health care experts will introduce the topics to be discussed in this course. Dr. Jeffrey Levi offers insight into the patchwork system of health care in this country. Dr. Donald Arthur explains the critical balance between cost, quality, and access to health care. Todd Linden describes how health care is financed and Dr. Donald Berwick explains the six dimensions of quality in health care.
Note: As a reminder, additional Learning Resources for the week are listed below the Media Player. Be sure to scroll to the bottom of the web page to view the complete list of Required and Optional Resources.
Video: Palfredman, J., & Reid, T. R. (2008). Sick around the world. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/sickaroundtheworld/
Video Transcript: Palfredman, J., & Reid, T. R. (2008). Sick around the world. Retrieved fromhttp://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/sickaroundtheworld/etc/script.html
To view this video, click on “Watch the Full Program Online.” Five separate videos present the health care systems of Great Britain, Japan, Germany, Taiwan, and Switzerland and compare each to the U.S. health care system. The videos are required for the Discussion posting this week.
Course Introduction (located in the left navigation bar)
Course Text: Kovner, A. R., Knickman, J., & Jonas, S. (Eds.). (2011). Jonas and Kovner’s health care delivery in the United States (Laureate Education, custom ed.). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Chapter 1, “The Current U.S. Healthcare System”
Chapter 1 describes the defining characteristics of the U.S. health care system as well as the major issues and concerns facing the health sector. Content also highlights the key importance of leadership for a strong health care system.
Chapter 1a, “An Overview of Charts”
Chapter 1a offers a high level overview of healthcare organizations and how they are financed. The material should be reviewed for a high level understanding rather than a detailed analysis.
Chapter 4, “Comparative Health Systems”
Chapter 4 examines the evolution of health care policies of multiple industrialized countries and compares these policies to the U.S. health care system.
e-Book: Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Retrieved fromhttp://site.ebrary.com/lib/waldenu/docDetail.action?docID=10032412
Read the “Executive Summary” pages 1–20 only.
This e-book was instrumental in establishing guidelines for quality health care that is both cost efficient and accessible. The “Executive Summary” provides an analysis of the current U.S. health care system and provides recommendations for health care reform.
U.S. Health Care Reform
This Web site presents the latest on U.S. healthcare reform.
WBS Using Principles Of Project Scheduling And Budgeting
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!