Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Journalism and Storytelling
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Journalism and Storytelling
Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies have transformed the way we consume and experience information, creating new opportunities for journalism and storytelling. With VR and AR, journalists and storytellers can immerse their audience in a way that was previously impossible, allowing them to explore and interact with stories in a new way. In this article, we will explore how VR and AR are being used in journalism and storytelling, and their impact on the industry.
Virtual Reality in Journalism and Storytelling
VR allows journalists and storytellers to create immersive experiences that transport their audience to different places and events. This technology can be particularly powerful when reporting on conflicts or other dangerous situations, where it is difficult to bring the audience to the scene. With VR, journalists can take their audience to the frontlines of a conflict, giving them a first-hand experience of what is happening.
One example of this is the VR documentary “The Displaced” by The New York Times, which tells the stories of three children who were forced to leave their homes due to conflict. Through VR, the audience can experience the children’s stories in a more immersive way, seeing their surroundings and emotions as if they were there.
VR can also be used to provide a more interactive and engaging experience for readers. For example, The Guardian’s VR experience “6×9: A Virtual Experience of Solitary Confinement” puts the viewer in a virtual prison cell to experience the isolation and sensory deprivation of solitary confinement.
Augmented Reality in Journalism and Storytelling
AR offers a different kind of storytelling experience, overlaying digital information onto the real world. With AR, journalists and storytellers can provide their audience with additional context and information about a story, enhancing the reader’s understanding of a topic.
One example of this is The New York Times’ AR feature on the Apollo 11 moon landing, which allows the reader to place a virtual model of the lunar module on any flat surface and explore it in detail. The AR feature also includes audio commentary and text explaining the various components of the spacecraft.
AR can also be used to enhance print and digital content, allowing readers to interact with stories in new ways. For example, National Geographic’s AR experience “Explore Parts Unknown” allows readers to scan images in the magazine with their smartphones to access additional information and interactive content.
Challenges and Limitations
While VR and AR offer exciting new possibilities for journalism and storytelling, they also present challenges and limitations. One of the main challenges is the cost of producing high-quality VR and AR content. VR and AR experiences require specialized equipment, such as 360-degree cameras and software, and can be time-consuming to create.
Another challenge is the accessibility of VR and AR content. While the technology has become more widely available in recent years, many people still do not have access to VR or AR devices, and there are concerns about the potential for creating a digital divide between those who can access this technology and those who cannot.
In addition, there are limitations to the technology itself. VR can cause motion sickness in some people, and the immersion can be overwhelming for others. AR experiences can also be limited by the quality of the camera on the device being used, and the accuracy of the tracking technology.
Conclusion
Overall, VR and AR technologies offer exciting new possibilities for journalism and storytelling. With VR, journalists and storytellers can create immersive experiences that transport their audience to different places and events, while AR can provide additional context and information to enhance the reader’s understanding of a story. While there are challenges and limitations to the technology, it is clear that VR and AR are here to stay and will continue to transform the way we consume and experience information.
Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Journalism and Storytelling
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THE PROFESSIONAL ESSAY CUSTOMIZED FOR YOUY NOW – CLICK NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!