Utilitarianism Exegesis Paper Assignment Help
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Utilitarianism Exegesis Paper Assignment Help
Imagine you have already written an introduction to a paper. Your imagined thesis statement in this paper is: “I will argue that Mill’s account is superior to Kant’s.” For this assignment you will be writing your exegesis (or background) section on MILL. You will need to write a multi-paragraph paper (double spaced 2-2.5 pages, 12 pt font, minimum 800 words) laying out the important features of Mill’s utilitarian account.
-You must use citations for quotes and paraphrasings! You can cite like this (Mill, 96). Use the page numbers assigned in our book.
-The point of this assignment is to prove to me you understand the assigned reading, not that you understand Crash Course or other YouTube videos on Mill! Make sure you stay close to this text!
More help for this assignment can be found here: http://myweb.fiu.edu/escarbro/wp-content/uploads/sites/427/2016/10/paper_exegesis_pwc.pdf (Links to an external site.)
The following are quotations of important part of the chapater
According to Mil, after deciding your preference, it is your moral obligation to choose between either the higher or the lower pleasure. Mil is therefore stating that pleasure is going to be associated with choosing the better choice of the highest pleasure.
Few humans would consent to be an animal.
We would prefer to be a dissatisfied human rather than a satisfied pig.
Intellectual pleasures are better than lower pleasures
Higher pleasure committed under temptation is a just postponing lower pleasure
Being someone with higher faculties force you to need more in order to be happy.
People require more stimulating experiences, like higher pleasures, but sometimes they will opt for a lower pleasure.
You are aware that your choice is not necessarily the best one, but you make a lower pleasure choice because it is a temptation.
For those who can make a decision on this topic, there should be no objection to their decision.
Apart from morality and consequences, which of the two pleasures (higher and lower) would be worth having (best for your feelings).
To know which is worth more, you must have knowledge of both pleasures and that they differ.
People have to be less scared to accept the fact that some pleasures are better than others
Happiness for everyone.
People must not only think of their own happiness but the happiness of “all concerned”.
People must focus on universal happiness.
Emphasizes the significance of the correct way for the utilitarian standards to be increased.
One’s own happiness is not the most important however is just as equally important.
Utilitarianism requires the person to be strictly impartial as a spectator and happiness should be in harmony with interest to the whole of society
Promotes happiness within society in addition to individual happiness.
In other words, utilitarianism isn’t always a bad thing although it can be shown in a bad light at times.
“He who saves a fellow creature from drowning does what is morally right…”
In other words, this means that, to do good or act in a good way to help others is the most important thing. Knowing the motifs of why doing such an action, is not as important as the morality of the act itself.
-That statement is directly related to what would be considered Altruism (Doing good at all times, no matter the circumstances).
-The “Whys” behind the actions do not have the same weight as of the action itself.
Utilitarianism Exegesis Paper Assignment Help
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!