They Call Me Mr. Process Story
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
They Call Me Mr. Process Story
Story: They Call Me Mr. Process
I have always been an organized person. Growing up, my room was neat, I kept track of my grades, my clothes were put away, and my bed was made.
I have always felt a sense of discomfort if I did not know what was going on. In college, I quickly learned that organization was the key to success,
and I carried the same philosophy into my professional career. Even fresh out of college and working in my first job as a manufacturing engineer, I
was quick to offer suggestions to my more experienced colleagues regarding ways to implement processes to improve the efficiency of the
organization. It did not take long before someone gave me the nickname “Mr. Process.” Although the name was usually accompanied by some
smirks, I actually liked the name and referred to myself the same way when I interviewed for jobs later in my career.
Mr. Process obviously finds processes to be important in an organization, and processes are absolutely vital in the management of enterprise
content. Without well-defined processes, even good enterprise content will quickly tend toward chaos. Without these processes, there is no control
over how data are modified and maintained. Data need to be managed. The importance of data management policies can be better understood with
an example from my own work experience.
In the early 1990s, I joined a software development company as the vice president (VP) of product development. At the time, the company only had
13 employees, but they dealt with a significant amount of information because they had sales of $3.5 million per year and over 1 million customers.
Enterprise content included a large customer database, large repositories of software source code and documentation, and reams of technical
support information. The small staff was having difficulties trying to stay abreast of day-to-day operations and had consequently paid no attention to
the management of these important collections of valuable content. Mr. Process did not like this at all.
During one of our weekly executive staff meetings, I raised the issue of enterprise content gone wild. I explained to the members of the staff how it
was virtually impossible to locate and identify all of the software source code we were supposed to be working with. I offered examples of how our
source code was being modified with proper controls and how it was difficult to even build products because of unauthorized changes. I told them
how the technical support staff (who I was in charge of) were unable to find past support information on customers and how they were forced to
enter the same information multiple times, and how they could not access historical information so they could learn from a knowledge base. These
were just some of the complaints I lodged.
Of course, the chief executive officer (CEO) asked me what I thought should be done to improve the situation. When I responded “data governance” I just received blank stares from around the table. I explained that data governance involves instituting well-defined policies and procedures for the
management of enterprise content and also making sure that even the changes to policies and procedures were only made with proper authorization
and approval. I expected a great deal of enthusiastic support for this outstanding suggestion, but instead the CEO simply said “How much will this
cost?” Unfortunately, my response was not really what everyone wanted to hear. I was not, however, asked to leave the room, so I continued.
It was actually not that hard to show the executive staff how much money we were losing from inadequate data governance. It was relatively easy to
show how an investment in data governance would quickly pay for itself and help structure the company for future growth (this last part everyone
understood and liked). Data governance became a part of the company that day. Because of our small staff count and the fact that I was already
known there as Mr. Process, I now held the cotitles of “Mr. Process” and “Data Governor.”
I began my tenure with a full evaluation of the enterprise content, the data sources, and the current processes used. There was a lot of room for
improvements that were quickly identified merely by getting the information organized. For example, we implemented a source code control system
with secure access rights that required all software engineers to check their code in and out of the system and have approvals on code changes
before check-in could take place. I estimate that our software engineering department’s productivity increased by 30% the day this system was
running. A relatively simple issue-tracking system was implemented in the tech support department, which ensured that all support calls were
logged and shared for future reference. This system enforced strict data governance on all technical support information and saved significant
money for the company. These are just some of the examples of changes made that were part of a larger data governance plan for the company.
Moral of the Story
If the shoe fits, wear it. I’m proud to be called Mr. Process because there have been so many times in my career that I have seen the positive result
achieved by instituting good processes in an enterprise. I did not always know what the term data governance meant, but I have always known that if
you do not have well-defined processes in place for management of the data in an organization, then the data will not be nearly as useful as it could
be. Even the processes must be managed so they stay current and effective. Data governance and the processes it manages must be a key part of
any healthy organization.
The preceding story demonstrates how processes play a key role in enterprise content management. Without good processes, content will quickly
tend toward disorganization and inefficiency. Data governance helps ensure that policies are in place and maintained so the content management
will be effective for the future. For this discussion, research the library and Internet for information about data governance, and respond to the
questions below. Consider how the company in the story had to face some of these questions and how they addressed similar issues.
Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 400–600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas,
and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your
- How do you think data governance impacts the processes used to handle data in an organization?
- What steps should be followed to properly evaluate an organization’s processes that are related to content management?
- Select 1 area of data governance, and describe how data would be handled with and without data governance policies in effect.
- Discuss the effect on the business as a result.
They Call Me Mr. Process Story
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!