The Technical Definition of A Deductively Valid Argument

The Technical Definition of A Deductively Valid Argument

Order ID	53003233773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

The Technical Definition of A Deductively Valid Argument

EXIT SURVEY

Format: Copy and paste the below into a new document, then answer these questions.

Rubric: For the questions that are not about our course content, just answer them thoughtfully.

For questions about course content, be accurate, cite or quote our text, and edit your answers for clarity before final submission. If you do not wish to answer specific questions, it’s ok, just say “pass.”

How will this be graded? You most likely know by now because you have heard my feedback over these past two months.

But if you remain unsure of how this will be graded, come to office hours and ask. If you cannot make those, Canvas message me and we can set up a time.

I have attempted to make this course about learning, and not your grade. You are not alone in completing this. You can ask me for help on this assignment, just as on any other.

Give yourself a breather and ask for my assistance if you are lost. I am here to help!

Recommendation: Do not submit this too quickly. Some of you wrote rubrics for an A, B, C and so on for our last Discussion Board. You should wait until those have been considered. This course ends on 3/26, but I will allow you to submit until 3/29 at 11:59 PM, which is a strict deadline.

____________________________

Pre-Class Questions:

1. Once again, offer a brief biographical statement.
2. Why did you enroll in this course?
3. Was the course subject matter what you thought it would be?
4. How many hours per week did you think you would need to use for our course? Include class times, or watching recorded videos, and anticipated study time.

____________________________

Logic Questions (All answers need to reference our text and what we have studied together this semester. Explain and support what you say here by quoting our text and other resources as you think appropriate. If you are not sure, you can ask me.):

1. What is an argument?
2. What is the technical definition of a deductively valid argument? Now give an example of a deductively valid argument a child would understand.
3. What is the technical definition of an inductively strong argument? Now give an example a child would understand.
4. What is logical analysis?
5. What is the intension and extension of Grossmont College?
6. Define our college ostensively first, and then operationally.
7. Define our college persuasively.

—————-

1. Upload any short clip here that you find argumentative. Identify 5 non-identical fallacies discussed in Chapter 4.
2. Choose one of those fallacies, how is truth related to those fallacies? (Hint: Discuss arguments.)

—————–

1. Upload a different short clip here about an issue concerning morality. State the argument. Then symbolize the argument using three sentence symbols.
2. Use a truth table to show the argument is valid or not.
3. Could you use natural deduction to show the same result as in 12?
4. Now state the content of the clip as a moral argument.
5. Is the moral argument deductive?

——————-

1. Use analogical reasoning to argue against a heavy beer drinker who thinks marijuana should be illegal.

——————-

1. Watch Raskin’s speech and then explain what is a necessary condition for unprotected speech. Week 6 Viewing: Rep./Lead Impeachment Manager Jamie Raskin’s Closing Argument in the Second Impeachment Trial (VIEW)
2. Write a complex rule for unprotected speech.
3. Can you guess from Representative Raskin’s presentation where the Rule of Law about unprotected speech comes from? How is analogy related to your answer?

——————–

1. What is truth analysis?
2. How is truth analysis related to the content of our course?

____________________________

Post-Class Questions:

1. What part of the course was most difficult for you? What part of the course was easiest?
2. What forces external to you obstructed your course performance the most? (No need to divulge personal information. You can just say a personal matter if that was the biggest obstacle.)
3. What forces internal to you obstructed your course performance the most? In other words, how could you have improved your comprehension of Logic, or your understanding of what we have studied together over the last four months? (Again, no need to get personal.)
4. Are you glad to almost be on Spring Break?
5. If you were to assign yourself a grade, what would that grade be? (This has no bearing on your actual final grade.)

The Technical Definition of A Deductively Valid Argument

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!