- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
The Significance of Writing in Presenting Research at Conferences
The Significance of Writing in Presenting Research at Conferences
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
The Significance of Writing in Presenting Research at Conferences
Writing is a crucial aspect of presenting research at conferences, as it serves as the primary means of
communication between researchers and their peers. It is through writing that researchers can present
their findings, ideas, and arguments in a clear and concise manner, and it is also through writing that
they can engage with the broader scientific community and contribute to the advancement of
knowledge in their field.
There are several key ways in which writing plays a significant role in presenting research at
conferences.
First and foremost, writing is the primary means by which researchers can convey the key findings and
implications of their work. When presenting research at a conference, it is important to clearly and
concisely summarize the main points of the study, as well as its broader significance and implications.
This requires carefully crafting a written abstract or summary that accurately represents the research,
while also making it accessible and engaging to a broad audience.
Writing is also an essential part of the process of preparing a conference presentation. Researchers must
carefully organize their thoughts and ideas, and structure their presentation in a logical and coherent
manner. This often involves writing detailed outlines or scripts for their talk, as well as creating visual
aids such as slides or handouts to support their argument. By carefully considering the structure and
content of their presentation through writing, researchers can ensure that their ideas are effectively
communicated to their audience.
In addition to conveying the key points of a research study, writing is also crucial in engaging with the
broader scientific community and advancing the field. Researchers often have the opportunity to submit
their work for publication in conference proceedings or academic journals, and the quality of the written
manuscript can be a determining factor in whether or not it is accepted. Thus, it is important for
researchers to take the time to carefully craft their writing, ensuring that it is clear, concise, and well-
supported by evidence.
Furthermore, writing can serve as a tool for researchers to engage in critical analysis and evaluation of
their own work, as well as the work of others. By writing about their research and reflecting on its
strengths and limitations, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of their own findings and how
they fit into the broader context of the field. Similarly, by reading and writing about the work of others,
researchers can engage in critical evaluation and synthesis of the existing literature, and identify gaps
and opportunities for future research.
In conclusion, writing is a crucial aspect of presenting research at conferences, as it serves as the
primary means of communication between researchers and their peers. Through writing, researchers
can present their findings, ideas, and arguments in a clear and concise manner, and engage with the
broader scientific community to contribute to the advancement of knowledge in their field.
The Significance of Writing in Presenting Research at Conferences
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
