- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- academicperfect@gmail.com
The Quantum Computing Race And Several Key Players
The Quantum Computing Race And Several Key Players
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
The Quantum Computing Race And Several Key Players
The development of quantum computing has the potential to revolutionize industries such as finance, healthcare, and energy, among others. As a result, there is a global race to build a functional, scalable, and commercially viable quantum computer. But who will cross the finish line first?
There are several key players in the quantum computing race. These include established technology giants such as IBM, Google, and Microsoft, as well as up-and-coming startups such as Rigetti Computing, IonQ, and PsiQuantum. Each of these companies has its own approach to building a quantum computer and is making progress in advancing the technology.
IBM is one of the pioneers in the field of quantum computing and has been developing quantum computers for over a decade. The company has made significant progress in improving the performance and scalability of its quantum computers and has made them available to the public through its IBM Quantum Experience platform. IBM has also been working on developing quantum algorithms for applications such as optimization, cryptography, and machine learning.
Google made headlines in 2019 when it announced that it had achieved quantum supremacy, which means that its quantum computer had solved a problem that was too difficult for classical computers to solve. Google’s quantum computer, called Sycamore, is based on superconducting qubits and has 53 qubits. However, some experts have raised concerns about the practicality and usefulness of Google’s achievement.
Microsoft is also investing heavily in quantum computing and is developing a topological quantum computer based on Majorana fermions. The company has made progress in developing the hardware and software needed for a topological quantum computer and has partnered with several universities and research institutions to advance the technology.
Rigetti Computing is a startup that is developing quantum computers based on superconducting qubits. The company has made progress in improving the performance and reliability of its quantum computers and has also developed a quantum cloud platform that allows researchers and developers to access its quantum computers remotely.
IonQ is another startup that is developing quantum computers based on trapped ions. The company has made significant progress in improving the performance and scalability of its quantum computers and has also developed a quantum cloud platform that allows researchers and developers to access its quantum computers remotely.
PsiQuantum is a relatively new startup that is developing a photonic quantum computer. The company is working on developing the hardware and software needed for a scalable and commercially viable photonic quantum computer.
While each of these companies is making progress in advancing quantum computing technology, there are several challenges that must be overcome before a functional, scalable, and commercially viable quantum computer can be built.
One of the major challenges is the issue of quantum noise and error correction. Quantum computers are susceptible to errors due to their sensitivity to external interference and noise. Developing error correction techniques that can address these errors is a major challenge that must be overcome before quantum computers can be used for practical applications.
Another challenge is the issue of scalability. While companies such as IBM, Google, and Microsoft have made significant progress in increasing the number of qubits in their quantum computers, the number of qubits needed for practical applications is still much higher than what is currently available.
There is also the issue of developing quantum algorithms that can solve practical problems. While there has been progress in developing quantum algorithms for certain applications, such as optimization and cryptography, there is still much work to be done in developing algorithms for other applications.
Finally, there is the issue of cost. Building a quantum computer is a complex and expensive undertaking that requires significant investment in hardware, software, and expertise. Developing a commercially viable quantum computer that can compete with classical computers in terms of cost and performance is a major challenge that must be overcome.
In conclusion, the race to build a functional, scalable, and commercially viable quantum computer is well underway, with several key players making progress in advancing the technology.
The Quantum Computing Race And Several Key Players
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THE PROFESSIONAL ESSAY CUSTOMIZED FOR YOUY NOW – CLICK NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
