- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism Discussion
The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism Discussion
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism Discussion
This is on philosophy of art
- You are going to search for three articles in your area the philosophy of X.
USE THIS TEMPLATE TO SUBMIT YOUR WORK INTO RESEARCH 3 SUBMIT
Article Title:
Author:
Journal: (name and volume #)
Date:
Pages:SMC Database searched:
Link to Article: Permalink for EBSCO HOST/Remote Access URL for JSTORSearch terms used:
Strategy:
Result List #:
- Search the philosophical literature for articles within the last 20 years using your background information (developed from Research 1 and Research 2 ) .
How?- Search in the data bases of the Santa Monica College LibraryLinks to an external site..
— See the link to SMC Library Databases (in the column on the left)
— If not already familiar with database searching then review this guide: On Using the SMC Library Data Bases- Make sure that in the end your selected articles are retrievable by title or by author from the SMC Library’s data bases.
Check them by title or by author after you have decided which to include in your report. In other words, take the article title and put in a title search for it. Anyone should be able to find your articles in the SMC database by searching for the titles or authors that you supply….BUT
You will initially search for articles using the various search terms that you assembled from Research 2. You will be conducting conceptual searches. You shouldn’t already have a title at hand (where from? another course?). You are to be looking fresh for articles that meet your conceptual interest in the philosophy of X.- For each of your three selected articles:
(a) List the author, article title, journal title, volume, date, page; note that the journal title is the major publication in which the article originally appeared. The journal title is usually given right after the article title. Sometimes it is titled “The Journal of…”; sometimes not (e.g., “Mind”, “Phronesis”, “Business Review”, “American Law Review”, “Acta Mathematica”, etc). The article title and journal title are often so close together on the bibliographic page that the best thing to do it to click on the article and check it. Then you can clearly tell the article title and realize that what comes after it on the bibliographic page is the journal title. The Journal title is followed by volume #, date and pages.
Make sure you retrieved a primary source article, not a book, not a review (not a book review), not an editorial commentary, not an editor’s review of articles in a given edition. Before clicking “Search” put a check mark in the appropriate boxes–and even then after each title is retrieved inspect it; click on the article and check the first page or two (does it say Reviews at the top? You’re in the book review section of the journal. Make sure it is an article from a peer reviewed journal by placing a check in the appropriate box for EBSCO HOST. The articles from the JSTOR database are already limited to peer reviewed journals. Set the dates (1999 to 2020), Put a check for full text availability (you don’t want to be retrieving articles where the whole text is not available to read).In philosophy a primary source article will typically be an argument, a thesis, a developed position with reasoned support.
(b) Make sure to include which SMC database was used for each article and the link to the article inside the data base:
If using EBSCO HOST data base (inside Academic Search CompleteLinks to an external site.) then supply the permalink for the article. Where is it? After you click on the article title and on the page that comes
up look over to the right for “Permalink” under the list of Tools. When you click on “permalink” the link appears at the top above the title. Copy and paste that for each article in your report from that database.
(Put the cursor at the end of the link and click enter so that the link highlights–lights up blue).
If the JSTORLinks to an external site. database is used then supply the “Remote Access URL”. After clicking on the article title the Remote Access URL is usually found somewhere on the left side of the page,
copy and paste it into your report for the article(s) retrieved in that database.
(c) List the search terms used and how they were used for each article retrieved.
For example, when using JSTOR if you restricted the search to philosophy journals then you should use conceptual search terms from your topic X; if you restricted the search to journals from your topic area,
then you should use philosophical search terms (review Unit I, epistemology, metaphysics, etc.).
— make sure that your articles are retrievable, can be found, the way you say they can;
— be sure to check the box for “full text” so that only those articles whose full text is in the SMC data base are retrieved
and…
when you retrieve a page(s) of listed articles be sure to count how far down the list (the result list) your article of interest is (was it the first article in the list, the second, #3, #87…etc?) = result list number.
The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism Discussion
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
