- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- academicperfect@gmail.com
The Impact of Penalties on Deterring Serious Workplace Misbehavior
The Impact of Penalties on Deterring Serious Workplace Misbehavior
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
The Impact of Penalties on Deterring Serious Workplace Misbehavior
Penalties are a common tool used by organizations to deter serious workplace misbehavior. While penalties can be effective in preventing misconduct, their impact may vary depending on a number of factors. In this article, we will explore the impact of penalties on deterring serious workplace misbehavior, and some of the factors that can affect their effectiveness.
Theoretical Framework:
To understand the impact of penalties on deterring serious workplace misbehavior, it is useful to consider the deterrence theory. The deterrence theory suggests that individuals will be less likely to engage in criminal or other types of misconduct if they believe that the risk of being caught and punished is high. The deterrence theory is based on the assumption that individuals are rational and weigh the costs and benefits of their actions. Thus, if the costs of engaging in misconduct, such as penalties or other punishments, are high, individuals will be less likely to engage in that behavior.
Factors Affecting the Impact of Penalties:
Severity of the Penalties: The severity of the penalties is a key factor that can affect their impact on deterring serious workplace misbehavior. If the penalties are too mild, they may not be enough to deter misconduct. On the other hand, if the penalties are too severe, they may be seen as disproportionate or unfair, which may lead to a negative impact on employee morale and motivation.
Certainty of Detection: The certainty of detection is another key factor that can affect the impact of penalties on deterring serious workplace misbehavior. If employees believe that they are unlikely to be caught, the penalties may not be enough to deter misconduct. Thus, it is important for organizations to implement effective detection and monitoring systems to increase the likelihood that misconduct will be detected.
Swiftness of Penalties: The swiftness of the penalties is another factor that can affect their impact on deterring serious workplace misbehavior. If penalties are not imposed quickly, employees may not see a direct link between their actions and the consequences. This can lead to a perception that the organization is not serious about enforcing its policies and can reduce the impact of penalties as a deterrent.
Consistency of Penalties: The consistency of penalties is another factor that can affect their impact on deterring serious workplace misbehavior. If penalties are not consistently enforced, employees may perceive the organization as being arbitrary or unfair. This can lead to a negative impact on employee morale and motivation, and reduce the impact of penalties as a deterrent.
Empirical Evidence:
Empirical research on the impact of penalties on deterring serious workplace misbehavior suggests that the effectiveness of penalties may vary depending on the specific circumstances. For example, one study found that the threat of penalties was effective in reducing the incidence of employee theft, but had no effect on employee absenteeism. Another study found that the effectiveness of penalties was dependent on the severity of the misconduct, with more severe misconduct being more likely to be deterred by penalties.
Another study found that the impact of penalties on deterring serious workplace misbehavior was influenced by the organizational culture. Organizations that had a culture of transparency and accountability were more likely to effectively use penalties as a deterrent. On the other hand, organizations that had a culture of secrecy and cover-up were less effective at using penalties to deter misconduct.
Implications for Practice:
The impact of penalties on deterring serious workplace misbehavior depends on a number of factors, including the severity of the penalties, the certainty of detection, the swiftness of penalties, and the consistency of penalties. To effectively use penalties as a deterrent, organizations should ensure that their penalties are appropriately severe, that they have effective detection and monitoring systems in place, and that they impose penalties swiftly and consistently.
In addition to relying on penalties alone, organizations should also consider using a variety of tools and strategies to prevent
The Impact of Penalties on Deterring Serious Workplace Misbehavior
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THE PROFESSIONAL ESSAY CUSTOMIZED FOR YOUY NOW – CLICK NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
