The ethics of online data mining
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
The ethics of online data mining
Online data mining refers to the practice of collecting and analyzing vast amounts of data from the internet to gather insights and make predictions. The process involves collecting information from websites, social media platforms, online marketplaces, and other sources of online data.
The ethics of online data mining are a complex and controversial issue that involves several moral and legal considerations. On one hand, data mining can be incredibly valuable in helping organizations make better decisions, improve products and services, and enhance the overall user experience. On the other hand, online data mining can raise serious privacy concerns and compromise individuals’ rights to control their personal information.
One of the primary ethical considerations of online data mining is privacy. Many people are concerned that their personal information is being collected and analyzed without their consent or knowledge. This can include sensitive information such as their name, address, social security number, financial information, and health records. As a result, individuals may feel like their privacy has been violated, and their trust in the companies collecting their data may be eroded.
Another ethical concern is that data mining can perpetuate biases and discrimination. The algorithms used to analyze data can reflect and amplify existing biases in society, leading to unfair treatment of certain groups of people. For example, if a company uses data mining to target job ads, and the data it uses is biased towards a particular race, gender, or age group, then this can result in discrimination against other groups.
To address these ethical concerns, it is important for companies to implement strong privacy policies and obtain consent from individuals before collecting their data. Additionally, companies must ensure that their data mining algorithms are transparent, fair, and do not perpetuate biases. The algorithms should be regularly reviewed and updated to ensure they are not biased towards any particular group.
Moreover, there is a need for greater regulation of online data mining to ensure that the practice is ethical and respects individuals’ rights to privacy. Governments around the world have already begun to address this issue, with many countries implementing laws and regulations to protect the privacy of citizens and regulate the collection and use of personal data. For example, the European Union has introduced the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) to ensure that personal data is collected and processed in a fair and transparent manner.
In conclusion, the ethics of online data mining is a complex and challenging issue that requires careful consideration of both the benefits and risks of the practice. Companies must ensure that they respect individuals’ rights to privacy, avoid perpetuating biases, and implement fair and transparent algorithms. Additionally, there is a need for greater regulation of online data mining to ensure that the practice is ethical and respects individuals’ rights to control their personal information.
The ethics of online data mining
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!