- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
The debate over backdoors in encryption
The debate over backdoors in encryption
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
The debate over backdoors in encryption
The debate over backdoors in encryption is a highly controversial issue that has been debated by experts, politicians, and the general public for decades. Encryption is a critical tool used to secure communications and protect sensitive information from being intercepted or accessed by unauthorized parties. Backdoors, on the other hand, are intentional vulnerabilities built into encryption systems that provide a way for law enforcement or government agencies to access encrypted data.
Proponents of backdoors argue that they are necessary for law enforcement and national security purposes, as they can provide access to critical information needed to investigate criminal and terrorist activities. In their view, the benefits of having backdoors outweigh the potential risks, as they believe that encryption technologies can be designed in a way that only authorized parties can access the data.
Opponents, however, argue that backdoors are inherently dangerous and create a significant security risk. They argue that creating a backdoor for one party automatically creates a vulnerability that can be exploited by others, including hackers and foreign governments. They also argue that adding backdoors to encryption systems undermines the very purpose of encryption, which is to provide a secure means of communication and protect sensitive information.
Another concern is the potential for abuse of backdoors by government agencies or other actors. The use of backdoors can be a slippery slope, leading to potential misuse and violation of privacy rights. Furthermore, there are concerns that backdoors can be used to spy on citizens or silence political opposition.
Another issue is the global nature of encryption. Encryption systems and technologies are widely used across the world and it is difficult to control how they are used and who has access to them. This means that even if a government were to impose a backdoor on encryption systems within its own borders, there is no guarantee that the data being encrypted would only be accessible by that government.
Finally, there are also technical challenges associated with implementing backdoors in encryption systems. Encryption is a complex field and adding a backdoor requires a deep understanding of the technology and its underlying mathematical principles. This creates the risk that the backdoor could be inadvertently or intentionally exploited by unauthorized parties, potentially leading to widespread security breaches and loss of sensitive information.
In conclusion, the debate over backdoors in encryption is complex and multifaceted, with valid arguments on both sides. While backdoors may provide a way for law enforcement and government agencies to access encrypted data, they also create significant security risks and raise concerns about privacy, abuse, and technical feasibility. Ultimately, the decision on whether to support backdoors in encryption must be carefully considered and weigh the potential benefits and risks.
The debate over backdoors in encryption
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THE PROFESSIONAL ESSAY CUSTOMIZED FOR YOUY NOW – CLICK NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
