The Childs Overall Development Essay Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
The Child’s Overall Development Essay Assignment
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY: Find six Internet resources that you believe are particularly fascinating, and write a three or four sentence annotation for each resource.
On one of the topics below.
REFLECTIVE JOURNAL: Also referred to as JOURNAL. Write a three-page (approximately 750 words) reflective journal for this unit that demonstrates that you have contemplated and understand the material, and that you comprehend how it relates to science and Science as a Process. You may make use of the guiding questions listed under Think About It! for this assignment.
The assignment requires three full pages of writing, double-spaced with starndard margins and miminal headings. Choose on of the unit objectives or guiding questions (“Think About It” questions) and write the entire three pages on this single topic, and its relationship to the principles and practices of scientific inquiry.
You must use two outside sourcrs of infomration, and these sources must be acknowledged with in-text citations and listed in a Literature Cited Section at the end of the Reflective Journal eassay. You may also use your textbook (Goldstein and Goldstein, 1989) as a source, if appropriate.
The in-text citations should be of the format (author’s last names, years of publication) enclosed within parentheses and within the sentence that includes the information. Two examples follow:
Goldstein and Goldstein (1980) indicated that there is no prescribed process for experimentally testing a hypothesis.
Although it is commonly understood that theories cannot be proven correct; they also cannot be proven wrong (Goldstein & Goldstein, 1980).
Gould (1997) argued that religion and science are not in conflict. Explain the details and basis for his belief, and discuss some of the published criticisms of his conclusions, as well as presenting your critique of his essay.
Not all experiments are designed to test important theories about nature or to seek greater details about current paradigms. Some are more
prosaic. Let’s assume for the purposes of this item, that you are scientist working for either a governmental agency or a consumer group. A new
product call Mileage Extender or ME comes across your desk. Design and describe an experiment you might conduct to test the effect of this
potential fuel additive on automobile-efficiency as measured in miles per gallon (mpg). ME is a liquid chemical that is intended to be added to the
gas tank each time the tank is filled with gasoline. Cover issues such as, (1) sample size, (2) means of ensuring that the only variable that can
assistants that are collecting the data, and (5) any other essential details.
Why should more general theories of nature be so highly sought and prized? Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of generalized theories
and more specific theories.
Hypotheses may be considered “reasonable candidates” for possible answers to a question and/or possible explanations of how a process works.
Scientists may begin a study with multiple working hypotheses—for instance from item 2 above, Hypothesis 1: ME improves engine performance,
Hypotheses 2: ME has no effect on engine performance, or Hypothesis 3: ME decreases engine performance. More complicated questions and
processes may have numerous potential hypotheses, some of which are not immediately obvious. Discuss why we (scientists and laymen alike)
may have great faith in a hypothesis or theory that cannot be proven true or false?
Science is an open endeavor, and anyone with the time and inclination may conduct observations and experiments, contribute to the formulation
expedition and took a voyage on the H.M.S. Beagle, (2) a monk in Czechoslovakia tested his hypothesis that inheritance was particulate and not
equivalent to a blending of fluids, (3) a very young Polish student in Paris discovered and characterized radium and realized its medical potential,
(4) a meteorologist gathered evidence that all the continents had at one time been united to form a single, super-continent, (5) a clerk in the Swiss
patent office wrote papers on the photoelectric effect, Brownian motion, special relativity, and E = mc2, (6) a young PhD geneticist began her study
of maize and its genetics—she made contributions to understanding the structure and evolution of corn genes and chromosomes. Select one (1)
of these workers (at least three of them were awarded Nobel Prizes, and one received two) and discuss how she or he contributed to modern
theories in biology and/or physics. Did their role as “outsiders” affect their status as scientists or to the acceptance of their ideas? Were their
ideas accepted quickly, slowly, ignored, or even disparaged? Did they ever find positions at prestigious universities or did they die unknown to the
general scientific community?
Assignment 2: Discussion—Influences on Child Success
There are many different areas of impact on a child’s life, including the influences of the family, peers, school, and community. Within these areas of influence, it is important to understand how all of the various influences help the child’s overall development.
Using the module readings as well as information from the Argosy University online library and the Internet, research the contributions of various influences on children. Then reflecting on a real or hypothetical child or focusing on theoretical aspects of these influences, respond to the following:
Select an influence such as family, peers, school, or community.
Describe a situation where it has a major impact on child success.
How could this important factor change in relation to the age of the child or the socio-economic status of the child?
Describe how you can intervene in this changed situation to increase the child’s success.
Write your initial response in a minimum of 300–400 words. Incorporate information from at least two academic sources to support your statements or ideas. Academic sources could include your textbook, required readings for this module, or academic journal articles found in the Argosy University online library. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.
By Saturday, January 17, 2015, post your response to the appropriate Discussion Area. Through Wednesday, January 21, 2015, review and comment on at least two peers’ responses. Consider commenting on the following: The Childs Overall Development Essay Assignment
Do you think that your peers’ intervention plans will help in the child’s success?
Now that you have read your peers’ intervention plans, are there any additional steps that you would like to incorporate in your intervention plan? Give reasons for your answer.
The Childs Overall Development Essay Assignment
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!