Testament of a Murdered Monk Case Study Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Testament of a Murdered Monk Case Study Essay
Deeply held beliefs influence every aspect of life, even when they are not clearly related to religion. This course helps you to become more literate in a major theological tradition (Christianity), and more aware of the ways that core beliefs play out in everyday life. This paper asks you to examine beliefs about the human person found in an everyday item of your choice, and to discern how those beliefs are similar to, or different from, the beliefs studied in this course. This paper focuses on identifying beliefs when they are expressed in non-theological language, and comparing those expressions to Christian theological tradition as studied in this course, noting similarities and differences.
Write a 4-5 page paper (1000-1250 words) analyzing the anthropology implicit in a text of your choice from contemporary culture, and comparing that anthropology with Christian views studied in this course. Possibilities for a text include (but are not limited to):
- Music or music videos
- Comics, video games, movies, TV shows
- Social media: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, or any format that allows a user to develop their views in public (such as in a series of tweets or posts)
- News items or editorials about contemporary events, e.g., #MeToo, deportation of undocumented immigrants, Black Lives Matter, etc.
- Articles on new technologies in society and how they affect us
- Advertisements (TV, radio, internet)
- Articles on genetic engineering, euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, or other life issues
- Marketing strategies from articles in business textbooks or journals
- Items from self-help literature
- Paintings, sculpture, theater, dance
Because you will compare and contrast the text with Christian views (see below), look for texts that are not from an obviously Christian point of view . Look also for texts that will give you a lot to work with. If you are not sure if your choice is appropriate, please run it past me soon.
What does “anthropology” mean? In this context, it means the view of human beings found in the text. “Implicit” indicates that the text most likely will not come right out and say “Here’s how we view the human person…” You will have to look beneath the surface of the text.
Analyze how the text views the following questions of anthropology:
- What is the origin of the human person? Do we invent ourselves?
- Is the person essentially an individual or essentially related to others? How are strangers or enemies regarded?
- What are human limits (e.g., the fact that we die or can’t do some things)? Are such limits positive or negative?
- Are all humans equal?
- Are humans free, or do larger forces determine our fate?
- Are humans by nature good or bad? Does the text lean toward a more positive/upbeat or more negative/pessimistic view of human nature?
- What is the purpose of human life – why are we here?
Not every text will address every one of these questions, but try to find a text that will be relevant to several of them. Choose TWO of these questions, briefly compare and contrast Christian anthropology with the anthropology of your chosen item. Use Genesis, Aquinas, Himes, “Testament of a Murdered Monk,” Tanner and the ICT textbook to support your analysis. Be sure to cite your sources accurately.
How will you be graded? Check out the rubric here
Suggestions and Guidelines for writing papers in THEO 200
- Decide what your main point or insight is (thesis). Once you know this, you can organize the evidence and arguments that lead to your conclusion.
- As you look more closely at your chosen text and the course readings, you may decide to revise your thesis.
- Write your introduction and conclusion last.
- It is better to summarize a point from the readings than to quote extensively. Keep quotes short. If quotes are over 40 words, they should be in the form of a block quotation: separate paragraph, single spaced, slightly indented.
- Whether you paraphrase or quote a source, cite the author and page number. For Thomas Aquinas, cite the part of the article you are using like this: (Aquinas, I. 83.1, obj. 1), or (Aquinas I. 83.1, answer), or (Aquinas, I. 83.1, reply 3). For Genesis, cite chapter and verse like this: (Gen 1:28).
Use simple but standard English. No slang or unnecessarily complicated language.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!