Teaching Examples Critique Assignment

Teaching Examples Critique Assignment

Order ID	53003233773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

Teaching Examples Critique Assignment

Overview

As you know, the major assignment in class is a proposed teaching demonstration. All assignments this term help to prepare you for that major assignment. That is true for your assignment for this week, as well, since you have the opportunity to view several teaching demonstrations and critique them, based on the concepts you are learning in class.

Instructions

For this exercise, please choose TWO of the teaching demonstrations from the options provided in class and watch the videos carefully, taking notes as you do. Please review the assignments instructions and the grading rubric as you view and take notes to make sure you pay attention to the critical elements. Make sure you have also reviewed the class readings and videos up this week since you will draw from those concepts in your critique.

In your critique, include the following:

1. Identify the teaching strategies employed in the lessons—based on the active teaching strategies to which you have been introduced in the class texts.
2. Determine what “graduate level” elements were evident in the teaching—based on the higher levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy or Anderson and Krathwohl’s revision of Bloom.
3. Discuss elements of adult learning theory evident in the demonstrations.
4. Comment on the appropriateness and clarity of the LO’s. Did the LO’s focus on the lower or the upper levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy? How could you have stated the LO’s more strongly?
5. Analyze whether the teaching strategies were appropriate for the lesson topic and the LO’s based on class sources. Were the strategies effective? What better strategies could you choose to fulfill the LO’s?
6. How would you have changed the presentation to improve the lesson? What were the strengths and weaknesses?
7. What did you learn from watching these videos that you might incorporate into your own proposed teaching demonstration?

As you present a thorough critique of the two lessons, make sure to integrate concepts from the class sources that you used in your critique. Make sure to cite correctly per APA. Draw broadly from the class sources, rather than just share your opinion. In terms of formatting and structure, please use a title page per APA. Format your paper using APA headings to correspond with the major requirements (above) of this project. Moreover, writing and citations need to be clear and correct and commensurate with doctoral level work.

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

 

Teaching Examples Critique Grading Rubric

Criteria	Levels of Achievement
Content	Advanced	Proficient	Developing	Below Expectations	Not present
Content Review	33 to 35 Points Student meets the basic assignment requirements mentioned in the “Proficient” column but does so with exceptional clarity, detail, and insight.	30 to 32 Points Student provides adequate and accurate review of the teaching strategies, LO’s, etc., observed in the teaching demonstration following the prompts in the assignment instructions. Ideas are well-supported by references to the class sources.	27 to 29 Points Student captures some of the teaching strategies.	1 to 26 Points Requirements listed in the “proficient” column are significantly lacking at the doctoral level.	0 points Not Present
Analysis/Evaluation	46 to 50 Points Student meets the basic assignment requirements mentioned in the “Proficient” column but does so with exceptional clarity, detail, and insight. Analysis is superbly demonstrated.	42 to 45 Points Student provides an adequate analysis/evaluation of the effectiveness of the teaching strategies the instructor used in each demonstration with comments on application of adult learning principles. Ideas are well-supported by references to the class sources.	38 to 41 Points Student provides some analysis and evaluation.	1 to 37 Points Requirements listed in the “proficient” column are significantly lacking at the doctoral level.	0 points Not Present
Personal Application/Suggested Changes	19 to 20 points Student meets the basic assignment requirements mentioned in the “Proficient” column but does so with exceptional clarity, detail, and insight. Student exhibits strong insight in discussion of possible applications.	17 to 18 points Student discusses personal application to his/her own future teaching. Ideas are well-supported by references to the class sources.	16 points Student demonstrates some of the requirements listed in the “proficient” column but without appropriate depth at the doctoral level.	1 to 15 points Requirements listed in the “proficient” column are significantly lacking at the doctoral level.	0 points Not Present
Structure	Advanced	Proficient	Developing	Below Expectations	Not present
Writing, Formatting, and Citation	42 to 45 Points Student writing is exceptionally clear, persuasive and error free. Ideas are fully supported and correctly cited using current APA formatting.	38 to 41 Points Ideas are adequately presented; sentences are correctly constructed, and paragraphs are organized consistently with doctoral level writing. Writing is largely free of grammar, punctuation, and other writing errors. Contains any appropriate citations and references cited using current APA formatting.	34 to 37 Points Student’s writing deviates from the requirements in the “proficient” column in several ways.	1 to 33 Points Student’s writing deviates from the requirements in the “proficient” column in numerous ways.	0 points Not Present

Teaching Examples Critique Assignment

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!