System Development or Application Assurance Project
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
System Development or Application Assurance Project
Project 4: System Development or Application Assurance
Project 4: System Development or Application Assurance is a 1week project that explores cybersecurity implications related to software application development or procurement from the cybersecurity risk perspective. The deliverable in Project 4 is a documented procurement process that supports all three of the previous project results. The objective is to demonstrate the value-add of a procurement process that includes security principles, methods, and tools as used in the software development life cycle.
Project 4: System Development or Application Assurance Start Here
It is critical that cybersecurity professionals be able to use all applicable systems, tools, and concepts to minimize risks to an organization’s cyberspace and prevent cybersecurity incidents. In this project, you will demonstrate your understanding of how to apply security principles, methods, and tools within the software development life cycle. You will also apply your knowledge of the cybersecurity implications related to procurement and supply chain risk management.
This is the fourth and final project for this course. There are 13 steps in this project. Begin below to review your project scenario.
System Development or Application Assurance
Your vulnerability assessment has been completed, and it’s a good thing, because you found several system weaknesses in the area of application software security.
If these weaknesses were exploited, it could ruin your company’s reputation. Not to mention causing major disruptions to operations and unexpected costs.
You plan on following up on these issues this afternoon, but it’s about lunchtime, so you head out for a quick bite to eat.
You pass by Maria Sosa’s office and see her at her desk. You knock on her door frame, peek inside, and ask if she has a minute. Maria motions to you. “Come on in.”
“What brings you to my office?”
You give her a high-level overview of your findings, and tell her that after lunch, you plan to start taking an even closer look.
Maria says: “That sounds great. Can you write up your analysis and recommendations for solutions? I’d like to share this with important stakeholders at the executive meeting next week. How does that sound?”
You nod in agreement. Then you make a beeline back to your office and grab an energy bar from your desk. You need to prepare for your presentation for the meeting next week.
Your work will be evaluated using the competencies listed below.
- 1.1: Organize document or presentation clearly in a manner that promotes understanding and meets the requirements of the assignment.
- 1.5: Use sentence structure appropriate to the task, message and audience.
- 2.4: Consider and analyze information in context to the issue or problem.
- 9.4: Software Security Assurance: Demonstrate secure principles, methods, and tools used in the software development life cycle.
- 9.5: Software Security Assurance: Describe the cybersecurity implications related to procurement and supply chain risk management.
Artifacts to submit for this project
1) Software vulnerability assessment
2) Procurement policy list
3) Software acceptance policy
4) Test script procedures
5) Supply chain cyber security risk report
6) Acquisition alignment report
7) Supply chain risk mitigation final report
THIS IS WHAT IS REQUIRED FOR THE LAST
ARTIFACT. That is NUMBER 7 artifact above (Supply Chain Risk Mitigation Final Report)
Project 4: Supply Chain Risk Mitigation Final Report
Top of Form
Hide Assignment Information Turnitin® This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.
Rubric Name: Supply Chain Risk Mitigation Final Report
This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first-row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.Competency
Exceeds Performance Requirements
Meets Performance Requirements
Does Not Meet Performance Requirements
1.1: Organize document or presentation in a manner that promotes understanding and meets the requirements of the assignment.
1.5: Use sentence structure appropriate to the task, message and audience.
2.4: Consider and analyze information in context to the issue or problem.
9.4: Demonstrate secure principles, methods, and tools used in the software development life cycle.
9.5: Describe the cybersecurity implications related to procurement and supply chain risk management.
System Development or Application Assurance Project
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!