Syracuse Utilitarianism Ethical Theory Paper
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Syracuse Utilitarianism Ethical Theory Paper
Topic: What is the best theory to use in order to determine moral responsibility within your profession?
Given the work people in your profession do, what is the best way to make an ethical decision?
When making the argument, you should be prepared to make use of ethical theory in answering the question – you should primarily stick to one of the following that we discussed in class (Utilitarianism (Mill), Deontology (Kant), Virtue (Aristotle), and Social Contract/Justice (Rawls)). If you want to employ a different theory, or if you want to mix theories, please check with me first. In constructing your argument, you should focus on producing the following sections for the essay:
Section one: Explain how your chosen theory works, and what the theory’s assumptions are about what is important to consider (in evaluating human nature and in determining ethical actions) – you need to demonstrate that YOU understand and can explain the theory (consider using hypothetical examples to show the theory in action).
Section Two: Argue/defend your choice in terms of your profession. This should take two forms – first, do research to find an author who supports the use of the theory within your profession. You may have to broaden your field – law enforcement or health care, for example.1 Introduce and explain their argument in support of yours. Second, show how the theory you have chosen is compatible with your code of ethics (that is, you can show that the result of reasoning through the theory produces an outcome that is consistent with what a specific provision from your code of ethics requires) – to do this, include the use of a profession-relevant hypothetical scenario, showing why would your ethical theory be effective in offering a solution to the dilemma compatible with professional expectations and rules in your code of ethics.
Section Three: Explain a different ethical theory that does not offer a valuable approach. After briefly explaining how the theory works (demonstrating that you understand how the theory works), explain why it offers a challenge to your approach, and show why the theory you have chosen does a better job.
Importantly, you will be presenting an argument as to your position and those of your challenger. As such, you must offer reasons why you hold your positions, and you must support claims about your theorist and challenger through careful appeal to what your respective philosophers actually wrote. Claims you make about a particular philosopher must have textual support – arguments lacking the necessary textual support (through quoted, cited reference to relevant textual passages) will not earn a passing grade. Consulting secondary sources is not prohibited, BUT you will be assessed on how well you articulate your understanding (not how well you can quote others explaining their understanding).
Syracuse Utilitarianism Ethical Theory Paper
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!