Synthesis of Ethical Theory Discussion
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Synthesis of Ethical Theory Discussion
We will complete a synthesis of the ethical theory with one of the interlocking features of the pandemic. We will analyze three different pandemics from the list below,
- Health/healthcare pandemic
- Racism/Neo-colonialism pandemic
- Economic pandemic
- Climate pandemic
Your post should include all five steps.
What’s the problem? Select and post an artifact that symbolizes the complexity of the pandemic we are analyzing in this quarter. An artifact should have some professional weight to it and can include an artistic photo you took, a digital image you found online and edited, a music video, lyrics, an art piece in a gallery, a theatre production, choreographed dance, a ceramics piece, an art installation, or other symbols that capture our cultural Zeitgeist. Tell me why this piece captures well, for you, the complexities of the given pandemic(s). An artifact with the highest point value will push boundaries which may include the artistic medium (print and digital; auditory and visual), the content, or the scope of the idea. All artifacts should be cited crediting the artist, photographer, or website from which all artifacts were extracted. Citations should adhere to an established research style guide such as APA, MLA, or CMS.
They Say. Write or narrate a paragraph answering the question “What the right thing is to do?” from the perspective of one of the ethical theorist’s and their approach from the the quarter we are analyzing. E.g., “A utilitarian like Peter Singer would say the right thing to do given the economic pandemic is X and Y.” You should distinguish a philosopher from the approach you are referencing. In the example, I used Peter Singer as opposed to John Stuart Mill’s or Jeremy Bentham’s who have different versions of utilitarianism. I should be able to understand the philosopher and approach you are explaining. I am looking for citations back to the philosopher so know which works they wrote and be able to locate specific principles. Avoid vague summaries.
I Say. Write or say a paragraph arguing what you say is the right thing to do. Given what you say is the right thing to do, indicate if you are using the same ethical theory from step two to support your position. If not, what ethical theory are you using to support your position?
They Say. Ask someone else what they say is the right thing to do and identify what ethical theory they are using. Indicate the philosopher, what the ethical theory says, and how you know this is the theory that best supports their position.
Mechanics. Your quarter synthesis should total roughly 500-1,000 words or 5-7 minutes of video. If written, check your writing for spelling errors or typos and indicate your word count; if a video, edit to remove “ums” and other distracting features and include at minimum machine-generated captions. Ensure the lighting, sound, and video quality feature your ideas clearly. Both written and video versions should include a full list of all sources (works cited, references, or bibliography). Submit by the quarter due dates to be included in the tapestry of ideas that I will create for each quarter. All late submissions must be posted in the “Late Quarterly Syntheses” topic and you are required to meet with me during a 1-on-1 in order to score your work and ensure you have the requisite understanding to complete on-time work going forward.
Synthesis of Ethical Theory Discussion
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!