- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
Social Justice and Human Rights Essay
Social Justice and Human Rights Essay
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Social Justice and Human Rights Essay
Reading Responses
Due at start of class
Students are required to write 10 reading response papers, each worth 2.5 marks, which adds up to a 25% of the final grade. These assignments are due at the start of the class and they concern the readings for that class. For instance, the reading response for the readings on May 8 (Hobbes & Locke) are due at the start of the class on May 8. The reading responses are intended to be short exercises that get you to do the reading before class and to start thinking about the reading before we discuss it in class. Accordingly, you should write roughly 500 words and you should respond to the set of readings as a whole. That is, for May 8, you respond to Hobbes and Locke in one response rather than in two separate responses. The reading responses are intended to be more than a mere summary (they said this, then they said that, and then they said this again), but less than an essay (you are not making an argument). What you are doing is recording your response to the readings. Thus, I am looking for you to say what you found interesting (or uninteresting) in them, what you found important (or unimportant) in them, what you understood (or didn’t understand) in them, any comments or observations you have about them, and, possibly, connections you see between different sets of readings or how connections between the readings and the “real world.” The reading responses are not intended to be “formal” assignments in the sense that you have an introduction, conclusion, and argument in the middle, but they should be “formal” in the sense that they ought to be written in coherent English. It is not absolutely necessary that they be in prose form; but don’t just jot down a few unconnected bullet points. Late responses will not be accepted. Because things happen, you can submit one—but only one—response paper to me by e-mail, but it must be in PDF format and it must be received as close as possible to the start of class. Additionally, we have eleven classes with readings, but you are only required to write ten responses; this means that you can miss one set of readings without penalty.
Home>Business & Finance homework help>Marketing homework help>read the attachment
Write a 2 to 3 page paper based on Knowledge sharing within two (2) companies.
Comparing their transfer of knowledge.
Idea sharing, within the company from top-to-down and vice versa.
The purpose of sharing the information: I.E at General Electric, they share information, for the purpose of replicating another manager, within 2 years of the employees arrival, therefore the current manager must share information with his predecessor.
Find the purpose of sharing.
Pick any two companies and compare their reasons for knowledge sharing, how they share the knowledge and why?
The company’s have to be different company’s who are not in the same field. Eg. An accounting firm and an electrical company.
Compare the mediums which each company shares information, whether through memo’s or emails.
Focus on there knowledge sharing, how its done, why it done. The differences.
These must be real companies. Based on actual facts.
Social Justice and Human Rights Essay
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
