- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
SNHU Global Rain Algorithm Cipher Code Dissertation
SNHU Global Rain Algorithm Cipher Code Dissertation
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
SNHU Global Rain Algorithm Cipher Code Dissertation
At Global Rain, you are tasked with working with a client, Artemis Financial. Your client is a financial consulting company that develops individualized financial plans for savings, retirement, investments, and insurance for their patrons.
As an important step in Artemis Financial’s desire to modernize its operations and as a crucial part of the success of their custom software, they want to implement and apply the most current and effective software security. Artemis Financial has a public web interface and is seeking Global Rain’s expertise in taking steps to protect their client data and financial information.
Specifically, Artemis Financial is seeking to add a file verification step to their web application to ensure secure communications. When the web application is used to transfer data, they will need a data verification step in the form of a checksum. You have been asked to take their current software application and add secure communication mechanisms to meet their software security requirements. You will deliver a production quality integrated application that includes secure coding protocols.
Directions
You are tasked with examining Artemis Financial’s software to address any security vulnerabilities. This will require you to refactor the code base to add functionality to meet software security requirements for Artemis Financial’s application. Specifically, you will need to follow the steps outlined below to facilitate your findings, address and remedy all areas, and document your work in the Practices for Secure Software Report.
Algorithm Cipher: Review the scenario and the Supporting Materials. Determine an appropriate encryption algorithm cipher to deploy given the security vulnerabilities, justifying your reasoning. In your Practices for Secure Software Report, be sure to address the following:
Provide a brief, high-level overview of the encryption algorithm cipher.
Discuss the hash functions and bit levels of the cipher.
Explain the use of random numbers, symmetric vs non-symmetric keys, and so on.
Describe the history and current state of encryption algorithms.
Certificate Generation: Generate appropriate self-signed certificates using the Java Keytool, which is used through the command line.
To demonstrate that the keys were effectively generated, export your certificates (CER file) and submit a screenshot of the CER file in your Practices for Secure Software Report.
Deploy Cipher: Refactor the code and use security libraries to deploy and implement the encryption algorithm cipher to the software application. Verify this additional functionality with a checksum.
Include a screenshot of the checksum verification in your Practices for Secure Software Report. The screenshot must show your name and a unique data string that has been created.
Secure Communications: In the application.properties file, refactor the code to convert HTTP to the HTTPS protocol. Compile and run the refactored code. Then once the server is running, you can verify secure communication by typing https://localhost:8443/hash in a new browser to demonstrate that the secure communication works successfully.
Provide a screenshot of the web browser that shows a secure webpage and include it in your Practices for Secure Software Report.
Secondary Testing: Complete a secondary static testing of the refactored code using the dependency check tool provided below to ensure code complies with software security enhancements. You only need to focus on the code you have added as part of the refactoring. Complete the dependency check and review the output to ensure you did not introduce additional security vulnerabilities.
Include (1) a screenshot of the refactored code executed without errors and (2) a screenshot of the report of the output from the dependency check static tester in your Practices for Secure Software Report.
Functional Testing: Identify syntactical, logical, and security vulnerabilities for the software application by manually reviewing code.
Complete this functional testing and include a screenshot of the refactored code executed without errors in your Practices for Secure Software Report.
What if I receive errors or new vulnerabilities?
You will need to iterate on your design and refactored code, address vulnerabilities, and retest until no new vulnerabilities are found.Summary: Discuss how the code has been refactored and how it complies with security testing protocols. In the summary of your Practices for Secure Software Report, be sure to address the following:
Refer to the Vulnerability Assessment Process Flow Diagram and highlight the areas of security that you addressed by refactoring the code.
Discuss your process for adding layers of security to the software application and the value that security adds to the company’s overall wellbeing.
Point out best practices for maintaining the current security of the software application to your customer.
SNHU Global Rain Algorithm Cipher Code Dissertation
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
