Science Social Psychology on Self-Incriminating Confessions Dissertation
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Science Social Psychology on Self-Incriminating Confessions Dissertation
[Adapted from: Kosslyn, S.M. & Rosenberg, R.S. (2001).Psychology: The Brain, The Person, The World. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.]
The QAMRI method provides a means for critically evaluating experiments.It helps you to find connections between theory and data by making explicit the question being asked, the approach used to answer it, and the implications of the answer.This must be done in your own words, not the words used by the author(s) of the journal article.
If multiple experiments are reported in the paper, do each step for the set of experiments together, rather than separately for each experiment.
Bullet points are fine, and a brief summary is expected (within 2 pages, double-spaced). This means you need to be concise and capture the big ideas, not the details.
Also feel free to note anything about the article that you do not understand.
Use the headings below in your QAMRI article summary.
Put a title block at the top of the page, consisting of
The full citation of the article (in APA format).
Q stands for Question
All research begins with a question, and the point of the research is to answer it.For example, we can ask whether a placebo is better than no action in alleviating depression.For most journal articles, the General Introduction should tell the reader what question the article is addressing, and why it is important enough that anyone should care about the answer.
Questions fall into two categories: broad and specific. In your QAMRI, state both the broad and the specific questions being asked.Broad questions are typically too general to answer in a single experiment, although one should view the experiment as one step on a journey to answer the broad question.An example of a broad question might be “Does language influence perception?”This sort of question provides the general topic of the paper and can only be answered through compiling many experimental results. In contrast, the specific question can typically be addressed in a single experiment or set of experiments. A specific question might be “If one language has a specific term for one color, and another language does not have any term for that color, will speakers of the two languages perceive the color differently?” Again, be sure to identify the broad and specific question.
A stands for Alternatives
Good experiments consider at least 2 possible alternative answers to a specific question and explains why both answers are plausible.For example, the possibility that speakers of different languages will perceive colors differently is plausible based on evidence that top-down processes can affect perception.The alternative hypothesis, that language does not influence perception of color, is also plausible because color perception in particular might be impervious to top-down influences.That is, it might be based solely on properties of the visual system which are unaffected by language.When describing an existing article or when proposing an experiment, you should identify the alternatives the authors considered.There are always at least 2 alternatives: that factor X will show an effect, or that it won’t (that a null result will be obtained).If possible, identify other alternative patterns as well.
M stands for Method
This section identifies the procedures that were used to implement research design.It should state the independent variable (the factor being experimentally manipulated or observed) and the dependent variable (the behavior being measured at the outcome) of the experiment.It should also describe the participants, including whether and how participants were divided into groups receiving different experimental manipulations.Briefly describe the experimental procedure.
R stands for Results
In your own words, what was the outcome of the experiment?Describe the results of the primary measures of interest.For example, did different subject groups yield different group means? Or did the entire subject population produce a distinctive pattern of responses?Describe that pattern in a straightforward way. You do not need to include results that do not address the primary research question.
I stands for Inferences
What can the results of the experiment tell us about the alternatives?If the study was well designed, the results should allow you to eliminate at least one of the possible alternatives.For example, if a language has a relevant color word but the speakers of that language respond to the color no differently than speakers of a language lacking a term for the color, then the experiment supports the view that language does not influence color perception.
At this point, take a step back and think about any potential problems with the experiment that could have led to the pattern of results obtained.Were there confounds that could have caused the results?For example, if they did find a difference between the subject groups, are there other ways in which the groups differ that are not language-related?Might this have caused the result?In addition, this is the section in which to consider the hypothetical next step in answering the broad question. If you were to conduct a follow-up experiment, what would it be (hint: think of questions that remain unanswered by the present results, and sketch a study that could bear on one or more of those questions)?Science Social Psychology on Self-Incriminating Confessions Dissertation
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!