Risk Management Program Assignment Essay

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

Risk Management Program Assignment Essay

Running head: Risk management Program 1

Risk Management Program

Student’s name

Institutional Affiliation

Course Number and Name

Instructor name

Due Date

Introduction

Information and data are crucial to Cigna’s activities. It is devoted to safeguarding its customers’ on the whole right to security and liking the confidence they place in the company. The organization’s wide security rules and norms are the bedrock of Cigna’s network protection program. CIP has adjusted Cigna’s online protection program. Cigna Corp Company gathers and utilizes sensitive personal data about our clients’ wellbeing and prosperity to support them worldwide. The company has a thorough security program to ensure and mindfully utilize our clients’ data. The company’s security consistency program is intended to guarantee that sufficient approaches, preparing, announcing systems, episode the board cycles, and preventive measures are set up to shield individual data from hurt brought about by ill-advised assortment, use, sharing, or insurance.

Because it is a medical-based organization, HIPAA laws are among the regulatory compliance and control criteria it must conform to. These guidelines ensure that everything e-PHI they create, receive, keep, or communicate kept private, secure, and accessible. They also recognize and protect against threats to the data’s security or integrity that are reasonably foreseeable. The HIPAA rules also safeguard against reasonable expectations of prohibited uses or disclosures. HIPAA laws must be followed (Wu, Spafford and Zeni, no date). They ensure that individuals’ health information is securely protected while also considering the flow of health information required to provide and promote first-rate therapeutic benefits and ensure the overall wellbeing and success of the population.

Risk Management Framework

Cigna Corporation is committed to maintaining a globally recognized security and data assurance program that adheres to internationally established procedures and regulations, such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s Cyber security Framework (NIST800-37). The company’s risk management framework includes the following steps: Categorization of the company’s information systems, which specifies the type of system that should be included. The selection of security controls is the next step. Suitable security control is chosen from NIST publication 800-37 to provide a more consistent, comparable, and repeatable approach to selecting and configuring security controls for Cigna Corp Company systems (NIST, 2017).

The next stage is to put security controls in place. All processes and procedures are documented in this location. Another step is to evaluate security controls. The company ensures that all of the chosen security controls are implemented here. The following phase is information authorization, in which the organization ensures that all security safeguards are functioning properly, intending to minimize risks. Finally, security control efficacy and efficiency are monitored.

When deciding on and implementing design and framework upgrades, the company considers that each component that can be modified should be reified to be updated. For example, it’s the case with the four aforementioned critical structural components. As a result, they are regarded as first-class elements. The following options are available for engineering and framework updates: The organization begins by clearly understanding its requirements. The following stage considers every part under design and framework updates after having a decent understanding and knowledge of its destinations (NIST, 2018). The engineering and framework are then divided into several segments that may be easily examined and modified. The construction of a model comes next, followed by identifiable proof and evaluation of non-utilitarian requirements.

Risk Management Program

The integration of TVM and SRR into the NIST800-3 system at TVM allows Cigna Port Company to recognize continuously, survey, group, remedy, and relieve security flaws and fully comprehend the underlying driving investigation to address expected flaws in the strategy process. Furthermore, SRR ensures that the engineer knows the framework requirements and is ready to proceed with the underlying framework plan. This survey aims to see if the framework requirements are captured in the framework execution detail.

The NIST800-37 structure’s lifespan begins with the program’s creation, progresses to a system enhancement, and finally to program support. Each of the four phases involves a set of security duties, such as vulnerability management, risk rating/prioritization, security risk evaluation, and architecture change audits, which are required to integrate security into the system development process properly.

Conclusion

With cyber dangers rapidly evolving and data volumes skyrocketing, many firms, like Cigna, are seeking to ensure a high level of security. Implementing a solid network security system (CSF) can help you secure your company. Accepting the NIST800-37 framework is one of Cigna’s most impressive steps to ensure acceptable security within the company.

NIST800-37 system has the following merits to Cigna Corp: The organization can better understand current security threats using this methodology. The structure has also aided the firm in effectively communicating with all partners, including IT, business, and leadership teams. In addition, the NIST system has given the business the ability to examine expected instruments and cycles and identify mitigating methods.

References

Wu, R., Spafford, E. H. and Zeni, N. (no date) ‘Towards HIPAA-compliant healthcare systems

Related papers’.

National Institute National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2017). Risk management framework for information systems and organizations: NIST SP 800-37 revision 2.

National Institute National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2018). undefined. Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.

GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER

CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow

Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!