- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
Revisiting the Use of Penalties for Serious Workplace Offenses
Revisiting the Use of Penalties for Serious Workplace Offenses
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Revisiting the Use of Penalties for Serious Workplace Offenses
The use of penalties for serious workplace offenses is a topic that has been debated by scholars and practitioners alike. While some argue that penalties are an effective deterrent to prevent such offenses, others argue that the use of penalties alone is not enough to address the root causes of these offenses. In this article, we will revisit the use of penalties for serious workplace offenses, and discuss some of the advantages and disadvantages of relying on penalties alone.
Advantages of Penalties for Serious Workplace Offenses:
Deterrence: One of the primary advantages of using penalties for serious workplace offenses is deterrence. Employees who know that they will face penalties, such as termination, fines, or even criminal charges, may be less likely to engage in behavior that could lead to these penalties.
Accountability: The use of penalties can also help to hold employees accountable for their actions. Penalties make it clear that certain behaviors are not acceptable in the workplace, and that employees are responsible for their actions. This can help to create a culture of accountability, where employees understand that their actions have consequences
Protection of Company Assets: The use of penalties can also help to protect company assets. For example, penalties for theft or embezzlement can help to prevent employees from stealing from the company, which can be costly and damaging to the organization.
Disadvantages of Penalties for Serious Workplace Offenses:
Insufficient Deterrence: While penalties can be an effective deterrent, they may not be enough to prevent serious workplace offenses. Some employees may be willing to take the risk of being caught and facing penalties, particularly if they believe that they will not be caught or if they are facing significant financial pressures.
Incomplete Resolution: Penalties alone may not address the root causes of serious workplace offenses. For example, if an employee is engaging in fraud to cover up financial difficulties, simply imposing penalties may not address the underlying financial pressures that led to the offense.
Negative Impact on Workplace Culture: The use of penalties can also have a negative impact on workplace culture. If employees feel that they are being punished rather than supported, it can create a culture of fear and mistrust. This can lead to decreased morale, increased turnover, and decreased productivity.
Alternatives to Penalties for Serious Workplace Offenses:
While penalties can be an important tool in preventing serious workplace offenses, they should not be the only tool used. There are a number of alternatives that organizations can use to address the root causes of workplace offenses and create a positive workplace culture. Some of these alternatives include:
Training: Providing training to employees can help to prevent workplace offenses by ensuring that employees understand company policies and expectations. Training can also help to create a culture of compliance, where employees understand the importance of following policies and procedures.
Support: Providing support to employees who may be facing financial or personal challenges can help to prevent workplace offenses. This can include providing access to financial counseling, employee assistance programs, or other resources that can help employees address the underlying issues that may be contributing to their behavior.
Communication: Open communication between management and employees can help to prevent workplace offenses by ensuring that employees feel heard and understood. By creating an environment where employees feel comfortable raising concerns and reporting issues, organizations can identify and address potential problems before they escalate.
Incentives: Incentives can also be used to prevent workplace offenses by rewarding employees for ethical behavior. For example, organizations can provide bonuses or other incentives for employees who report issues or adhere to policies.
In conclusion, while penalties can be an effective tool for preventing serious workplace offenses, they should not be relied on exclusively. Organizations should use a variety of tools and strategies to address the root causes of workplace offenses and create a positive workplace culture. By providing training, support, communication, and
Revisiting the Use of Penalties for Serious Workplace Offenses
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THE PROFESSIONAL ESSAY CUSTOMIZED FOR YOUY NOW – CLICK NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
