Review on Personality Analysis Shutter Island
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Review on Personality Analysis Shutter Island
Shutter Island is a movie that gets its name due to the place that it is set up in: that is, it is based on Shutter Island, which is a place with a criminal prison where the criminally insane are held. Upon the disappearance of an inmate within the jail, Teddy Daniels and his friend are brought in to investigate and find the child murderer.
The movie unfolds as the audience follows Teddy in his investigation as he has to unmask so many things and secrets before he can manage to find the escaped detainee. It is within this escape that viewers get to see his different set of personality characteristics (Beckmann, K. M. 2010). We also get to see his life and how he does cope with the various instances that he faces a roadblock.
The primary purpose of this paper is to uncover the personality of Teddy Daniels through the lens of Sigmund Freud, a psychoanalyst, and Hans Eysenck, a psychologist who took a genetic approach to studying personality. Teddy Daniels manages to pull off his character, and it is not until it is revealed at the end of the movie, which he is, that we learn the truth. The film does manage to capture the audience sort of a horror movie that unveils itself.
Description of Personality Characteristics
Observably, Teddy is very short-tempered as he showcases within the flow of the film. He does not take well to instances that he is caught surprised or unprepared. When he is giving rounds in the cells, he gets to meet a guy, and he asks who he is. As the guy takes his time in turning, Teddy almost loses it and shots him until he realizes that it is George Noyce.
At the same time, there is evidence that as he was growing up, his relationships and environment greatly influenced his personality traits. Undoubtedly, the characteristics that he gained while growing up were greatly influenced by his environment, mainly due to his involvement in world war 11 as it is shown in the movie. From the coverage of his life, we can tell that he had a rough experience, and a better part of his life was in the midst of violence and chaos. We cannot ignore the traumatic events that he encountered while in Germany.
Another instance where he portrays short temperedness is when he gets to the hospital. He asks for the patient’s records but is denied, and at that moment, he almost quits his mission. The fact that his father has been a fisherman, yet he feared the sea, speaks a lot to his personality. Teddy Daniels is a man who has endured as much, and this has taken its toll on his behavior, causing his short temperedness.
Teddy believed Andrew Laeddis was a confined firebomber who set his home on fire and blamed his friend, Dolores Chanal, for her death. He admits later that he chose just the scenario for Andrew Laeddis. Laeddis was alleged to have been staying in C-ward, which houses the most violent offenders. Throughout the study, during his stay in the hospital, Teddy gets migraines, delusions, and hallucinations.
Teddy starts to think of medical experiments in the brain of these patients, such as ice-pick lobotomies, due to the visions and hallucinations (Visser, 2010). He becomes fascinated with the thought of being intentionally taken to the hospital so that they can preclude him from learning the veracity about the clinic (Visser, 2010). As the film progresses, Rachel Solano will gain details about the nature of the lobotomies in the old light. Teddy breaks into the house to locate Solano and other suspects that leads him to meeting a therapist, who finally informs him he really is Andrew Laeddis. He denies it and believes that it is a tall tale.
Teddy’s adulthood life was a descriptive combatant, but after he was part of the liberation force at Dachau concentration camp, he became a changed man (Visser, 2010). There were the most severe and horrific tortures of the inmates, and the soldiers who were open-minded and witnessed the happenings at the camp with no hesitation in padding and shooting the SS officials. Later, however, Teddy was accused of killing unarmed people and agreed that he would only fire in the future if his life hinges on it (Visser, 2010).
Stubborn and Observant
He believes that the staff are messing with the residents ‘ minds and trusts Chuck in attempts to collect ample information to show the system what it really is. He asked chucks to get him the files, and when chucks decline, he seeks out a way to get to the patients and interview them on the experiments that land him to the lighthouse (Visser, 2010). Though he only has dreams in his past, he hardly accepts them as a reality. He visits the word c and denies the allegations that George passes. George has a clear memory of what happened, and he really knows who teddy really is.
He is an intelligent, highly functioning person, to the point that his traumatic experiences during World War II merely dented his coping abilities instead of making him overwhelmed. But the moderate, socially appropriate alcoholism and the workaholic that he displayed as a family man only gave him emotional isolation from the violent madness in which his psychotic wife was bursting. Teddy’s strategic astuteness is renowned among the Marshals; he has recently broken up a high profile case (Visser, 2010). During the war, he spent time at an internment camp. Review on Personality Analysis Shutter Island
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!