- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
Reconsidering the Use of Penalties for Serious Workplace Infractions
Reconsidering the Use of Penalties for Serious Workplace Infractions
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Reconsidering the Use of Penalties for Serious Workplace Infractions
The use of penalties for serious workplace infractions has long been a standard practice for promoting ethical behavior and enforcing compliance. However, in recent years, there has been growing concern that this approach may not be as effective as previously thought, and that penalties may actually be creating unintended consequences that undermine the very goals they are intended to promote.
In this article, we will explore some of the arguments against the use of penalties for serious workplace infractions, and consider alternative approaches that may be more effective in promoting ethical behavior and ensuring compliance.
Arguments Against the Use of Penalties
One of the main arguments against the use of penalties for serious workplace infractions is that they are often applied inconsistently and unfairly. This can lead to perceptions of bias and discrimination, and may even result in legal challenges that can be costly and time-consuming for the organization
Another argument against the use of penalties is that they can create a culture of fear and retaliation. Employees who are penalized for violations may become resentful or afraid, and may be less likely to report future violations or speak out against unethical behavior. This can create a toxic workplace culture where violations are ignored or covered up, and where ethical behavior is discouraged.
Finally, some argue that penalties are simply not effective in promoting ethical behavior. Research has shown that while penalties may deter some employees from engaging in unethical behavior, they may also lead to more sophisticated forms of misconduct that are harder to detect and punish. In addition, penalties may be viewed as a cost of doing business, and may have little impact on the overall behavior of the organization.
Alternative Approaches to Promoting Ethical Behavior
Given these concerns, many organizations are exploring alternative approaches to promoting ethical behavior that go beyond the use of penalties. Some of these approaches include:
Emphasizing the positive: Rather than focusing on punishment and negative consequences, organizations can focus on promoting a positive culture of ethics and compliance. This may involve highlighting examples of ethical behavior and rewarding employees who demonstrate a commitment to ethical conduct.
Creating a culture of trust and openness: Organizations can work to create a culture of trust and openness where employees feel comfortable reporting violations and speaking out against unethical behavior. This may involve implementing anonymous reporting systems or creating an ombudsman position to handle employee complaints.
Investing in education and training: Organizations can invest in education and training programs that promote ethical behavior and provide employees with the knowledge and tools they need to avoid violations. This may involve developing a code of conduct or providing regular training sessions on topics such as conflict of interest, discrimination, and harassment.
Leading by example: Finally, organizations can lead by example by ensuring that senior leaders model ethical behavior and promote a culture of transparency and accountability. This may involve creating a code of conduct for leaders, or implementing a system of checks and balances to ensure that leaders are held accountable for their actions.
Conclusion
While the use of penalties for serious workplace infractions has long been a standard practice, there is growing concern that this approach may not be as effective as previously thought, and may even be creating unintended consequences that undermine the very goals they are intended to promote. By exploring alternative approaches that emphasize the positive, create a culture of trust and openness, invest in education and training, and lead by example, organizations can promote a culture of ethics and compliance that is aligned with their values and mission. By taking a comprehensive approach to promoting ethical behavior, organizations can create a positive workplace culture and ensure that they are able to meet their ethical and compliance obligations.
Reconsidering the Use of Penalties for Serious Workplace Infractions
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THE PROFESSIONAL ESSAY CUSTOMIZED FOR YOUY NOW – CLICK NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
