Recommendation Report Study Paper Dissertation
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Recommendation Report Study Paper Dissertation
Part 1. This would be due, 1/5/22 AT 5 pm EST. For this practice, you will convert your first criterion paragraph of your Recommendation Report into IIA section of the Recommendation Outline. You will also post the References that correspond to in-text citations found in this section. Do not post an attachment. Post below after you have read comments in “view feedback” from the Final Recommendation Report. Be sure to view feedback on your Rec Report to ensure these sentences are correct before you copy/paste them. That way, you are more likely to earn full points for this assignment, as every error becomes a point deduction. See directions here for how to “view feedback” Download See directions here for how to “view feedback”
See the lecture for this assignment in Modules > All Video Lectures > Recommendation Outline. You will have a total of 4 sentences, no more, and no fewer, meaning one sentence per outline point. Start with II Body, then A. First Criterion (with the criterion title in bold and title case capitalization), and then, single spaced with vertical numbers, 1., 2., 3., 4., have one sentence for each outline point. Here is the skeleton document:
Underneath the sentences, post the Reference entry/entries that apply to the in-text citations. Note that in the actual Outline that you submit in the Dropbox, the only place where the References will appear is on the last page. You are just posting the References entry so that it can be checked for this practice. Canvas Discussions does not format the single spacing or hanging indent correctly, so disregard those aspects. But be sure the wording, punctuation, capitalization, italics, and so on are correct. Here are more examples of References entries.
Please note that for those having trouble with your References, I have just added a new sample References page in Modules. Go to Modules to All Video Lectures to Recommendation Report and it’s the last document linked. I also have it linked here. Download here.
Note on any copying/using/”borrowing”/paraphrasing/ summarizing the wording or ideas of the example below, any example in the Mediasites, and/or any peer in your group: this is considered plagiarism and is worth -10 pts per sentence or instance. This kind of copying shows up on a Turnitin report with your name on the paper. Please do not use any peer’s paper to copy from. Do not use my phrasing or examples I wrote myself below, in the Mediasites, and in the recommendation documents. This has happened in the past and has led to failing grades for the person doing the copying, so please do not force me to resort to failing anyone please.
Here is an example below in blue:
- Beer Consumption
Bad Boys Brewery will sell beer, so it’s important to tap into a consistent revenue stream from beer consumers; the ideal state has a higher consumption of beer, signaling the strong presence of beer lovers.
Each Utah resident on average consumed 18.7 gallons of beer on a yearly basis (Sauter & Stebbins, 2018).
In contrast, Floridians guzzled a whopping 26.3 gallons of beer yearly (Sauter & Stebbins, 2018).
With about 8 more gallons of beer consumed per capita annually in Florida compared to Utah, Florida will provide Bad Boys Brewery with greater opportunities for short-term organic growth and long-term expansion into regionally located retail liquor stores as well as bars and restaurants.
Sauter, M., & Stebbins, S. (2018). States drinking the most beer. 24/7 Wall St. https://247wallst.com/special-report/2018/06/15/st…
So you are posting your first criterion paragraph, from your Recommendation Report, followed underneath by IIA1.-4. from the Rec Outline. Underneath is the Reference entry/entries for any in -text citations in the sentences–keeping in mind that for the Outline, the only place you will find References are the last page. The placement of References here is just for them to be checked. You will use the feedback you get from this practice to write your entire, completed Recommendation Outline worth 75 points, due in the Assignments Dropbox labeled Recommendation Outline.
Part 2. This would be due 1/5/22 at 7pm EST. Recommendation Outline. This is a 5-to-6-page document based almost entirely on the Recommendation Report—Final. Submit it here. It is an individual, not group, assignment. Be sure to view the Mediasite lecture before completing this Outline. Go to Modules > All Video Lectures> Recommendation Outline Mediasite, Info to find this presentation. You must use the skeleton documentto
Download skeleton documenttocomplete the assignment.
So here are the sections needed for the Recommendation Outline in this order:
Title page, page 1, same as Title page for Rec Draft or Report
Page 2: I.A. through D., sentences taken directly from the Rec Report except for IA.
IIA. through C., with 4 sentences per criterion = 12 sentences in total for all of section II, taken directly from your Rec Report’s 3 criteria paragraphs.
Figure 1 for 3rd criterion including the Note: line with in-text citation; this is identical to the one done for the Rec Report, except leave out analysis paragraph underneath the Note: line; be sure this is corrected based on feedback.
IIIConclusions, taken directly from the Final, just corrected based on feedback.
IVA. and B., Recommendations, taken directly from the Final, just corrected based on feedback.
References, final page, either starting on the top of page 5 or page 6, same as you did for the Rec Report, now corrected based on feedback
Reflection Download Reflection(30 pts) and submit it here by 1/6/22 at 4 pm EST. Make sure you submit your Reflection by the deadline. Lateness penalties of -5% of total assignment points per day apply. Due to time constraints of final grades being due, late submitters must submit by 1/7/22 as otherwise, this assignment will be marked as a 0/30. Ten points will be lost if this reflection is full of general comments, is written in fragments, full of grammatical errors, off target/inaccurate, or is so vague that comments can apply to multiple presentations. If no reflection is submitted, all points will be lost.
PART 4… 1. Write your plan and method for your attention step. In 2-3 sentences, write down what you plan to do for your attention step for 1 minute or less in your Recommendation Presentation. Also, write down the method (video clip, music clip, prop, demonstration, skit, visuals, or combination of these methods).2. Also, post in 2-3 sentences what you plan to do for your audience connection. Write an example of what you plan to say in the Recommendation Presentation that fulfills this 7-point requirement.3. Finally, write down how you plan to improve upon any skills or criteria that you did not earn full points on in the Information Presentation. So if you had points deducted for lack of filler words, how do you plan to minimize your filler words in the Recommendation Presentation? Write down your improvement plan of 2-3 sentences per criterion that needs to be improved.
PLEASE TAKE NOTE THAT THERE ARE DIFFERENT SKELTONS TO BE USED
Recommendation Report Study Paper Dissertation
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!