Pursuing Operations Management Discussion

Pursuing Operations Management Discussion

Order ID	53003233773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

Pursuing Operations Management Discussion

You should arrange to interview with a professional that is in a position you’d be interested in pursuing.

Identify a member you might most be interested in interviewing. For example, if you would like to become a supervisor of a company you may want to interview a supervisor.

Be strategic, this is an opportunity for you to get to know someone better that you may not have had an opportunity to connect with.

Before you contact your interviewee, do some basic research about the career field. Clarify, for yourself, what you hope to gain through this informational interview.

When contacting your potential interviewee, you should do the following:

State who you are

Share if you were referred by someone

Explain that you are seeking career information and advice

Let them know this is for an assignment for your university

Ask when would be most convenient for them to meet

Be confident and courteous in your communication

Email or call them and use professional communication

During the interview you should:

Dress and act professionally

Build rapport and demonstrate your interest in the information

Take a list of questions with you and a notebook for notes

Keep the interview to 30 minutes or less

Take a business card when leaving

You should also follow-up with your interviewee

Send a short thank you note a day or two after the interview

Keep interview information on file for future reference—they may be an important contact in the future

You will be required to submit a list of both closed and open questions that you used for the interview with a brief summary of the information learned from each question.

You will present a five-minute oral report for the presentation to the class.

In the report, you will touch on the information that you learned following the interview

Information should be related to communication that you learned from the interview

You should have an introduction, body, conclusion, and transitions.

SAMPLE QUESTIONS

1. Describe the main responsibilities of your position.
2. What is most satisfying about your job and why?
3. What is least satisfying about your job and why?
4. How did you decide to get into this field?
5. Tell me about the training and education that you’ve had? Has this helped you in this field, if not, what has?
6. What recommendations do you have for someone wanting to enter or progress in this field?
7. What skills and personal qualities are important for success in your field?
8. What do you do during a typical work day?
9. What are the opportunities for promotion or advancement?
10. Is this field expanding and/or developing into new directions? Please explain how.
11. What is the entry-level salary range in this field?
12. Does your company use a lot of technology to communicate? If you could, explain these and how this affects communication.

IT 104 Orange County Risk Assessment in My Daily Life and Organizations Discussion

1. Do you, in normal life, perform risk assessments all the time on a variety of situations? If so, please explain and give examples.
2. How would you go about doing a risk assessment for an organization? Explain each step.
3. Once you have identified the areas of risk, what are your options for risk management? Give examples.

Pursuing Operations Management Discussion

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

 

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!