Purpose Of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Purpose Of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project
Adofo,
Purpose Of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project
The purpose of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) project is to develop an intervention to address adults patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The DNP PICOT question is: In adults with T2DM, in a primary
care setting, will implementation of the Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) via mobile technology (text messaging) impact fasting blood sugars in 8- 10 weeks?
Purpose Of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project
A comprehensive literature review of the current research was conducted to identify current evidence-based practice interventions to decrease fasting blood glucose levels in patients with T2DM. A systematic literature review is
vital to the review procedure and must provide a clear method as to how the literature findings were identified (Cooper et al., 2018). Thus, relevant literature search strategies are a very important part of translating research into
practice (Herrstrom et al., 2020). The articles were searched through Cochrane, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EBSCO, google scholars, and OVID technologies databases for the literature review. The keywords of “type 2 diabetes”,
“evidence-based intervention and technology” “technology and reduction of fasting blood glucose” as part of the PICOT question. The DNP student utilized Boolean phrases to narrow and or broaden my search. Database filters
based on inclusion and exclusion criteria including no articles older than 5 years, peer-reviewed journals, were used and narrowed down the number of articles after reviewing abstracts.
Purpose Of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project
The three main themes that emerge from the research findings are a) DSMES toolkit is effective in improving communication and enabling self-care behaviors, (b) promotion of active patients’ participation in T2DM management,
and (c) duration of intervention program influences T2DM outcomes (Dobson et al.,2017; Duffy et al., 2019; Greenwood et al 2017; McMillan et al., 2017; Nkhoma et al., 2021; Russell et al., 2017). Six research studies were
reviewed (Dobson et al.,2017; Duffy et al., 2019; Greenwood et al 2017; McMillan et al., 2017; Nkhoma et al., 2021; Russell et al., 2017) that described the DSMES based intervention to address the problem of T2DM. Researchers
identified that the DSMES intervention program through short text messaging can effectively reduce fasting blood glucose levels of patients diagnosed with T2DM (Dobson et al.,2017; Duffy et al., 2019; Greenwood et al 2017;
McMillan et al., 2017; Nkhoma et al., 2021; Russell et al., 2017). Purpose Of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project
Purpose Of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project
I will continue to work on my DNP project implementation by preparing my IRB pre-screening documents for approval. I am still working on my pre-screening documents but have completed my DNP practicum form in week one. I
will consider success as I wait for the review and edits of my DNP project.
Purpose Of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project
References
Purpose Of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project
Cooper, C., Booth, A., Varley-Campbell, J., Britten, N., & Garside, R. (2018). Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: A literature review of guidance and supporting
studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(85),1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0545-3 (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)
Purpose Of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project
Dobson, R., Whittaker, R., Pfaeffli Dale, L., & Maddison, R. (2017). The effectiveness of text message-based self-management interventions for poorly-controlled diabetes: A systematic review. Digital Health, (3), 1-
12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207617740315 (Links to an external site.)
Purpose Of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project
Duffy, S., Svenson, J., Chavez, A., Kelly, M., & Wise, P. (2019). Empowering community health workers with mobile technology to treat diabetes. The Annals of Family Medicine, 17(2), 176-
176. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2361 (Links to an external site.)
Purpose Of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project
Greenwood, D. A., Gee, P. M., Fatkin, K. J., & Peeples, M. (2017). A systematic review of reviews evaluating technology-enabled diabetes self-management education and support. Journal of Diabetes Science and
Technology, 11(5), 1015-1027.https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296817713506 (Links to an external site.)
Purpose Of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project
Herrström K., Larsson S., Einberg E., Nilsson M., Blomqvist K.,& Garmy P. (2020). Assessment of search strategies in literature-review-based candidate theses within a nursing program. Advances in Medical Education and
Practice,11,71-77. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S227547 (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)
Purpose Of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project
McMillan, K. A., Kirk, A., Hewitt, A., & MacRury, S. (2017). A systematic and integrated
Purpose Of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project
review of mobile-based technology to promote active lifestyles in people with type 2
Purpose Of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project
diabetes. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 11(2), 299-307.
Purpose Of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project
https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296816656018 (Links to an external site.)
Purpose Of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project
Nkhoma, D. E., Soko, C. J., Banda, K. J., Greenfield, D., Li, Y. C. J., & Iqbal, U. (2021). Impact of DSMES app interventions on medication adherence in type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ health &
care informatics, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100291
Purpose Of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project
Russell, N. M., Vess, J., Durham, C., & Johnson, E. (2017). Text-messaging to support diabetes self-management in a rural health clinic: A quality improvement project: OJNI. On-Line Journal of Nursing Informatics, 21(2) Retrieved
from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/text-messaging-support-diabetes-self-management/docview/1984822511/se-2?accountid=11250
Purpose Of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Purpose Of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Project