PSYCH 101 Summary of An Article
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
PSYCH 101 Summary of An Article
Article Summary Requirements – Spring 2014
1) Each article summary is worth 2 credits. If student decide to do at least one summary, they will need to complete either two article summaries (2 credits each), or one article summary (2 credits) and 2 additional credits of research participation, in order to complete the research requirement. 2) To get extra credit in the class, at least half the research credits or 1 article summary must be submitted by Friday, March 28th at 11:59 p.m, with no unexcused absences. 3) The final article summary or completion of 4 research credits is due by Thursday, May 8th at 11:59 p.m. 4) Late papers will not be accepted — no exceptions.
- Reports must review one scholarly research article published in any of the following four journals:
- Psychological Science in the Public Interest: http://psi.sagepub.com/content/by/year
- American Psychologist: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/amp/64/9/
- Cerebrum: http://www.Dana.org/news/cerebrum/archives.aspx
- Current Directions in Psychological Science: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118000080/home
- To access the articles, simply click on the publication year (or use the current issue) then click on the pdf link to download the article of your choice to your computer. In order to access certain journal websites, make sure that the cookies function on your computer is set to “always allow.” Also, you may have to use a campus computer in order to download articles from Current Directions in Psychological Science and American Psychologist. For articles in Cerebrum, you will need to click on the printer friendly version icon (top right corner) before printing and saving to your computer.
- Each research report will include a summary of the research plus student insights and thoughts about the research that was presented. (Template below.)
- NOTE: These are individual assignments and are not to be done in pairs or groups of students. The same articles reported by different students will be carefully scrutinized for evidence of individual work using SafeAssign (TM) software.
For each report, you will need an electronic copy of your summary:
- A written review and critique of the research article to include (template below):
- A summary (500-650 words) of the research in which you briefly describe the hypotheses, methodology, and basic findings. · A critique and discussion (250-350 words) of the significance of the research findings. This is a chance for you to “show off” your psychology skills by adding personal insight and thoughts about the research that was presented. For instance, one might discuss how the research might apply in another situation or context, or discuss how the research helped them understand an event that happened in their own lives. · Your paper MUST be a total of at least 750 words (not including the header). If you paper is less than this, you will not receive credit.
To Submit the Article Summaries:
- Log in to Blackboard. Under Courses click on PSY PARTICIPANT POOL (PSYCH- PARTICPANT-POOL-HR)
- Click on Assignments, then Click on “View/Complete” according to which article summary you are submiting (i.e. your first or second). Upload your document to SafeAssign.
- Please send your article summary as a Microsoft Word Document. Include in the filename your first and last name and either “summary1” or “summary2” (e.g., MichaelSmith_summary1.doc). This is for your protection so that you get credit.
- You will generally receive credit on your paper within 1 to 2 weeks, depending on the time of semester that it is submitted.
To receive credit for your summary, it must meet alI of these requirements. If your paper doesn’t meet all the requirements, the paper will be returned and no credit issued until you submit a version that does meet all of them. No partial credit is given. We advise you to submit your papers well BEFORE final deadline. That way if you need to redo the paper, you will have the time to do so.
Article Summary Template
Your Information Name (first and last): Red ID: Date: PSY 101 Professor: Article Information Author(s): Date of Publication: Name of Journal: Title of Article: Article Summary: Must be at least 500-650 words
Article Summary goes here
Critique and Discussion: Must be at least 250-350 words
Critique and Discussion goes here
PSYCH 101 Summary of An Article
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!