Project Management Smart sheets Discussion Essay
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Project Management Smart sheets Discussion Essay
Click here to watch the video
As workplaces shift to remote work, there is an increased need to utilize collaboration tools. In the first section of this course, you had the opportunity to reply to a message from a co-worker about the need to identify and adopt collaboration tools. At the end of this course, you will be delivering a presentation on a collaboration tool and persuading your organization to adopt it. To prepare for that presentation, answer the following question:
Select a category/type of collaboration tool from the three options below. Identify one collaboration tool from the category you’ve selected and describe how that tool can be used to support remote collaborative work. Then, list and thoroughly explain two pros and two cons of using this collaboration tool when working remotely.
Communication (Zoom, Webex, Teams)
Document creation and editing (Microsoft Word, Google Docs, One Drive)
Project Management (Smartsheets)
I have respondI like Zoom, Webex, and Teams platforms. It is so helpful to be able
to see everyone that is in the meeting with you, share your desktop so
all attendees can see what you are discussing, and be able to hold open
question and answer sessions. I feel like the videos are a nice way to
connect with your colleagues because you are actually interfacing with
them instead of just messaging or calling them. The platforms work via a
designated meeting code. Everyone is invited to the meeting via email
with the link and the code. When it is time to log in, the attendee can
click the link and type in the meeting code. They will be asked if they
want to join with video as well as audio. By selecting the video option,
everyone can be seen and heard as long as their volume is not muted.
The leader of the meeting can mute everyone in attendance if needed as
well. Everyone in attendance can select the option to share their
computer screen with the group. While sharing their screen, a person can
show everyone what they have accomplished, what still needs to be done,
or training tools they may have. Meetings can be broken into smaller
groups with the main group still being open so they can rejoin the
entire group. This feature works well for small group projects. The
small groups can be assigned by the meeting organizer and put into
“rooms” where they can discuss their plans away from the rest of the
group. The attendees can select to rejoin the main group when they are
completed with their work, or the leader can bring everyone back. The cons to these platforms would be security. There are more
security measures that have been added to Zoom since the major
“zoombombings” that occurred last year. Teams have a much better
multilevel security plan in place. However, security is still a big
issue with these programs, especially if used to host meetings handling
personal information that needs to be protected. A second con would be
cost. There are free levels for these platforms, but they have
restricted amounts of time that can be used and the number of attendees.
The cost is not too high, but for much smaller companies, this could be
an issue. Two of the best pros would be the ability to relate face-to-face with your attendees, and the ability to screen share. I feel these are the most important pros.
Multimodal Learning Style Discussion
I’m working on a communications discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
Understanding your learning style will help you maximize your learning in this course.
Learning Style: Multimodal
1.) How will this help you during the program (Organization Development and leadership)
2.) Given your learning style, what can you do to help yourself acquire and retain your learning?
3.) How can this help you work with others?
Project Management Smart sheets Discussion Essay
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!