Project Management Discussion Post Responses
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Project Management Discussion Post Responses
- You are right. Project management is very complex, and need many elements resolved for the project to be successful. Could you explain any two of these elements that you referred to as part of the complexity of project management?
In the define scope process there are several different inputs, the two most relevant to me are listed as follows:
The Project Charter – the charter provides almost everything you need to know about the project. It provides the description, characteristics, and all approval requirements. It also outlines the expectations and defines the project deliverables.
Project Management Plan – The project management plan includes the scope management plan. The intent is for the project management plan to break down the project in detail so that all members of the team can Cleary understand the intent.
Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) — sixth edition and agile practice guide. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
- Good post. I believe most of our classmates so far have included Project Charter in their response. Both inputs you included are important. Do you believe one is more important than the other?
- Below is 2 inputs to the define scope process;
Project charter-I really wanted to change it up a bit from the other responses but the project charter is the very detailed document that gives a great description of the entire project.
Project documents- The importance of having this is because it provides assumption log, the requirements documentation, and the risk register.
What are your thoughts?
- Here are my three valid elements of a good scope statement:
Executive Summary – I say this because this element explains the purpose of the project. It let’s stakeholders know what the project is all about and the key features of this project. Also explaining the need for it and how it will improve the company.
Exclusions: It’s calling out any items that will not be addressed by the project. This helps with miscommunication part of the project. If there are any assumptions or misconceptions of what will come out of the project. The exclusion section will let stakeholders be aware of what will not be in the project. This will in return keep a stratified client because they know what is expected and not expected.
Assumptions and Risks: This is where the risks can be addressed. It will also show what type of risks are we looking at so we have a holistic approach to what we think might happen in the project and it can better solve our solution if that problem occurs.
- Three good elements of a scope statement include:
Description-this is a high level overview of the project. This description will provide a good understanding of the project so that all of the stakeholders will have a clear understanding without getting to granular and detailed. I chose this because it is important for the stakeholders to know what the project is and more importantly they approve of the project and the scope prior to the beginning of the project.
Expected Outcomes- is the next element. This will provide the expected deliverables goals and objectives. This element is important because if done correctly it can help to prevent scope creep.
Constraints-Will show all of the limitations that the project may face. This includes risks and can be written using “if” and “then” statements. For example, “if this happens, then we will do this”
- I have to admit that I think of project deliverables as a work product – a document or group of documents that comply with the project’s requirements. Unless the client specifically details what, these deliverables will contain, which is often the case with RFPs, what is deliverable can be a murky target. I have worked on projects unrelated to what I do now, where there wasn’t clear unanimity on expected results.
We can sit around the conference table, discuss a specific deliverable, have everyone nod their heads and agree to move forward and find later that what I thought I heard and agreed to was something different from what someone else though they heard and agreed to. I say this to emphasis the need to view agreement on deliverables as an interactive process often requiring multiple reviews.
- I like your limits and exclusions! Without a limit and exclusion scope creep can happen leading to the landscape being added or the contractor collecting the data. Also, with limits and exclusions great ideas can happen to the project like let’s add a covered deck or let’s collect more data. These limits really can keep a project on point and higher chance of success.
Project Management Discussion Post Responses
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!