- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
Primary and Secondary Markets In The Financial World
Primary and Secondary Markets In The Financial World
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Primary and Secondary Markets In The Financial World
PLEASE READ NEED FOR WEEK 2
Why Article Reviews?
In this Introduction to Banking course you will review a new article every two weeks; your first article review will be due during Week 02. In Week 11 you will compile a list of all five articles you’ve reviewed with brief descriptions and personal feedback for each.
The article reviews are designed to give you an opportunity to research and learn about current events that affect the specific financial issues discussed during the two weeks you are writing the review. The purpose is to demonstrate how information covered in this course applies to the current financial world.
The first article you review should touch on the aspects of banking covered in Weeks 1 and 2:
Primary and Secondary Markets in the Financial World/Domestic and Global Finances
Determinants of Interest Rates and Time Value of Money
Suggested Article Sources
You may choose any article that fits the subject areas of Weeks 1 and 2.
For article sources, try http://www.ijcb.org, www.thebanker.com, and The Wall Street Journal at www.wsj.com.
You may also look for articles at your online college library, which is accessible through the Resources Tab.
Content Requirements
To review the content requirements for this assignment, click on the link below; you may print out the requirements document for continued reference throughout the 11 weeks of the course:
Format Requirements:
Cover page. (see link below)
One page long. (no more, no less)
Single spaced. (Double spaced between sections)
Font size: 12 point.
Font type: Tahoma
Margins: one inch all around.
Cover Page
To see a sample cover page, click on the link below:
What About Your Score?
Your article reviews will be scored on a scale of 1-20, with 20 as the highest score (10 maximum for presentation and 10 maximum for content). You will also receive an additional 10 points for turning the article reviews in on time-for a total of 30 available points. For a summary of how your instructor will evaluate and score your reviews, click on the link below.
Total Possible Score: 8.00
- Identifies Data Variable level and Reasons
Total: 1.60
Distinguished – Performs the following: 1.Correctly identifies all variable data levels and 2. Provides correct reasoning for placing variables in the nominal, ordinal, or interval, categories.
Proficient – Performs the following but misidentifies no more than three data types and/or the reasons: 1. Identifies all variable data levels and 2. Provides reasoning for placing variables in the nominal, ordinal, or interval categories.
Basic – Performs the following but misidentifies no more than eight of the data types and/or the reasons: 1. Identifies variable data levels and 2. Provides reasoning for placing variables in the nominal, ordinal, or interval, categories.
Below Expectations – Performs the following but misidentifies nine or more of the data types and/or the reasons: 1. Identifies variable data levels and 2. Provides reasoning for placing variables in the nominal, ordinal, or interval, categories.
Non-Performance – There is either no response to problem one, or it fails to provide any correct identification and/or reasoning.
- Generates Mean, Standard Deviation, and Range for Salary, Compa, Age, Performance Rating, and Service For the Overall Group as well as the Males and Females Separately
Total: 1.60
Distinguished – Performs all of the following correctly: 1.The data necessary for computations was selected accurately. 2. Accurate results produced. 3. The results are presented in a clear format. 4. Identified which variables this function does not work properly for. Correctly calculated and displayed asked for values for all three groups.
Proficient – One of the following was not done correctly: 1.The data necessary for computations was selected accurately. 2. Accurate results produced. 3. The results are presented in a clear format. 4. Identified which variables this function does not work properly for. Incorrectly calculated no more than three values.
Basic – Two of the following were not done correctly: 1.The data necessary for computations was selected accurately. 2. Accurate results produced. 3. The results are presented in a clear format. 4. Identified which variables this function does not work properly for. Incorrectly calculated no more than 14 total values.
Below Expectations – Three of the following were not done correctly: 1.The data necessary for computations was selected accurately. 2. Accurate results produced. 3. The results are presented in a clear format. 4. Identified which variables this function does not work properly for. Incorrectly calculated more than 15 values.
Non-Performance – There is either no response to problem two, or it does not provide correct statistical outcomes as asked for.
- Determines Probability
Total: 1.60
Distinguished – Performed all the following correctly: 1.The data necessary for computations was selected accurately. 2. Data counts were correct. 3. Produced accurate results. 4. Difference in values explained clearly.
Proficient – One of the following was not done correctly: 1.The data necessary for computations was selected accurately. 2. Data counts were correct. 3. Produced accurate results. 4. Difference in values explained clearly.
Basic – Two of the following were not done correctly: 1.The data necessary for computations was selected accurately. 2. Data counts were correct. 3. Produced accurate results. 4. Difference in values explained clearly.
Below Expectations – Three of the following were not done correctly: 1.The data necessary for computations was selected accurately. 2. Data counts were correct. 3. Produced accurate results. 4. Difference in values explained clearly.
Non-Performance – There is either no response to problem three, or it does not provide probability values as asked for.
- Finds Selected Values For Raw Scores That Cut Off the Top 1/3 of the Values Within the Selected Groups
Total: 1.60
Distinguished – Performed all of the following correctly: 1.Correct raw score identified for each group. 2. Z score correctly calculated. 3. Related probability determined. 4. Interpretation presented.
Proficient – No more than four errors were noted in the following: 1. Raw score identified for each group. 2. Z score calculated. 3. Related probability determined. 4. Interpretation presented.
Basic – No more than eight errors were noted in the following: 1. Raw score identified for each group. 2. Z score calculated. 3. Related probability determined. 4. Interpretation presented.
Below Expectations – No more than 15 errors were noted in the following: 1. Raw score identified for each group. 2. Z score calculated. 3. Related probability determined. 4. Interpretation presented.
Non-Performance – There is either no response to problem four, or it fails to provide any information on z-scores, distributions and relative value of different measures asked for in the question.
- Conclusions About the Male and Female Pay Equality
Total: 1.60
Distinguished – Provides thorough and accurate conclusions about the following issues: 1. Male and female pay inequality. 2. Consistency between and among different statistical measures of equality.
Proficient – Provides complete and mostly accurate conclusions about the following issues: 1. Male and female pay inequality. 2. Consistency between and among different statistical measures of equality.
Basic – Provides incomplete and/or inaccurate conclusions about the following issues: 1. Male and female pay inequality. 2. Consistency between and among different statistical measures of equality.
Below Expectations – Provides incomplete and inaccurate conclusions about the following issues: 1. Male and female pay inequality. 2. Consistency between and among different statistical measures of equality.
Non-Performance – There is either no response to problem five, or it fails to provide any correct response to the results about males and females.
Primary and Secondary Markets In The Financial World
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
