- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
Poor Proficiency Conceptualizing the Problem Dissertation
Poor Proficiency Conceptualizing the Problem Dissertation
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Poor Proficiency Conceptualizing the Problem Dissertation
Rubric Name: Undergraduate Generic Case and SLP Grading Rubric – Nov 4, 2013
Criteria Level 4 – Excellent
Level 3 – Proficient
Level 2 – Developing
Level 1 – Emerging
Score and Feedback
Assignment-Driven Criteria
25 points
Demonstrates mastery covering all key elements of the assignment in a substantive way.
22 points
Demonstrates considerable proficiency covering all key elements of the assignment.
18 points
Demonstrates partial proficiency covering all key elements of the assignment.
14 points
Demonstrates limited or poor proficiency covering all key elements of the assignment.
18 points
Critical Thinking
10 points
Demonstrates mastery conceptualizing the problem, and viewpoints and assumptions of experts are analyzed, synthesized, and evaluated thoroughly; conclusions are logically presented with appropriate rationale.
9 points
Demonstrates considerable proficiency conceptualizing the problem, and viewpoints and assumptions of experts are analyzed, synthesized, and evaluated proficiently; conclusions are presented with necessary rationale.
7 points
Demonstrates partial proficiency conceptualizing the problem, and viewpoints and assumptions of experts are analyzed, synthesized, and partially evaluated conclusions are somewhat consistent with the analysis and findings.
6 points
Demonstrates limited or poor proficiency conceptualizing the problem, and viewpoints and assumptions of experts are analyzed, synthesized, and limited or poorly evaluated conclusions are either absent or poorly conceived and supported.
7 points
Scholarly Writing
5 points
Demonstrates mastery and proficiency in scholarly written communication to an appropriately specialized audience.
4 points
Demonstrates considerable proficiency in scholarly written communication to an appropriately specialized audience.
3 points
Demonstrate partial proficiency in scholarly written communication to an appropriately specialized audience.
2 points
Demonstrates limited or poor proficiency in scholarly written communication to an appropriately specialized audience.
4 points
Quality of References and Assignment Organization
7 points
Demonstrates mastery using relevant and quality sources and uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to support ideas, convey understanding of the topic and shape the whole work.
6 points
Demonstrates considerable proficiency using somewhat appropriate sources and demonstrates considerable proficiency in using appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to support ideas, convey understanding of the topic and shape the whole work.
5 points
Demonstrates partial proficiency using occasionally appropriate sources and partially uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to support ideas, convey understanding of the topic and shape the whole work.
4 points
Demonstrates limited or poor proficiency using sources and appropriate and does not use appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to support ideas, convey understanding of the topic and shape the whole work.
4 points
Citing Sources
3 points
Demonstrates mastery using in-text citations of sources and properly format full source information in the reference list (bibliography).
2 points
Demonstrates considerable proficiency using of in-text citations of sources and properly format full source information in the reference list (bibliography).
1 point
Demonstrates partial proficiency using in-text citations of sources and properly format full source information in the reference list (bibliography).
0 points
Demonstrates limited or poor proficiency using text citations of sources and properly format full source information in the reference list (bibliography).
0 points
Overall Score
Level 4 45 or more
Level 3 40 or more
Level 2 35 or more
Level 1 0 or more
Score and Feedback
Overall Score
33
33 points
Feedback
Score 20 / 30 – Feedback Date Jun 23, 2014 5:12 PM Dropbox Feedback I would like to see more than just a chart. The chart is helpful, but I would like to read your analysis. Poor Proficiency Conceptualizing the Problem Dissertation
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
