Policy, Lawsuits, And the Mitigation Plan Dissertation
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Policy, Lawsuits, And the Mitigation Plan
It is important for those who have an interest in the criminal justice system or in law enforcement to learn about some of the challenges working in a litigious society can create. Criminal justice agencies have developed methods to reduce the chances of incurring lawsuits against their officers and departments. You will glean valuable insight and learn how to begin developing clear, concise, and substantive communication necessary for criminal justice and law enforcement officers.
In this LASA, you will create a 15–20 slide PowerPoint presentation and write your script from the perspective of one of the following roles in Centervale: an internal affairs investigator, compliance officer, or similar official seeking to mitigate and improve the department by reducing the number of legal actions filed against the department. You have been asked to do this presentation in response to the following scenario:
It is common to see groups of youths hanging around various locations in Centervale. A group of mischievous juveniles hang out at a 24 hour Burger Joint on Tenth Street on a fairly regular basis and often get into Saturday night scuffles with other groups of juveniles, which require the police to respond to clear the area. The owner of the Burger Joint has become increasingly concerned about a drastic decrease in sales; however, he continued to look the other way until the scuffles escalated into full-blown fights that involved weapons, such as knives or brass knuckles.
Recently, the owner of the Burger Joint called 911 in a panic because he thought he heard gunshots fired from the parking lot area during a scuffle. Officers from the Centervale Police Department (CPD) arrived on the scene to find several youths involved in a physical fight provoked by a verbal attack, but there were no visible signs of weapons. Officer Jack Newbie just completed Taser training at the Centervale Police Academy. Officer Newbie believes carrying a “non-lethal” alternative to a firearm is beneficial for law enforcement officers.
Officer Newbie and his partner proceeded with caution when attempting to break-up the fight at the Burger Joint because reports of weapons involvement can create very dangerous situations for officers as they approach. Sam White, 15 years old, who was not actively involved in the physical aspect of the scuffle, tried to flee from the scene. Officer Newbie did not give verbal commands before firing his Taser at White as he fled. The Taser’s 50,000-volt of electric shock caused White to go into cardiac arrest upon impact, but he was revived on the way to Centervale Memorial hospital. White’s girlfriend, Rosey Green, a small-framed female, who was visibly showing signs of pregnancy, was distraught and angry over White’s condition. Green jumped onto Officer Newbie’s back, bit him on the neck and punched him in the ear. Officer Newbie’s partner, Officer Joe Flash, Tased Green during the assault. Later that evening Green had a miscarriage and lost her baby. Green and her parents are now suing the CPD for use of excessive force against a minor.
The information from your Power Point Presentation will be used by the CPD to add or change policies and to make high-level executive polices to reduce lawsuits.
The following information must be included in your presentation:
Based on your research of the history and your research of issues surrounding liability in policing today, did Officer Newbie’s handling of the situation with White and Green create a liability or potential lawsuit situation for the CPD? Evaluate how the use of force was applied in this situation with regard to White’s attempt to flee the scene and Green’s physical assault of Officer Newbie and suggest a new policy based on your evaluation in your presentation.
The CPD’s current use-of-force policy states that the amount of force any officer may use against any individual may be one degree greater than the amount of force being applied by any individual against any officer. Compare and contrast CPD’s use-of-force policy with the facts of the Green Case. In your presentation, explain how Green’s behavior, the facts of the case (i.e., dispatch: fight with weapons), and Officer Newbie’s response align or misalign with the terms of the policy.
Create a mitigation action plan (MAP) that contains three recommendations supported by the findings of current empirical research that might help to reduce the number of lawsuits that could be potentially filed against the CPD.
Does the definition of a frivolous lawsuit apply to the situation with Officer Newbie and his handling of the White Case? Analyze and discuss how a potential lawsuit filed by White against the CPD might be perceived by the court and how the CPD might mediate or litigate a lawsuit of this nature.
Save the final presentation as M5_A1_Lastname_Firstname.ppt.
By Saturday, June 7, 2014, submit your final presentation to the M5: Assignment 1 Dropbox.
LASA 2 Grading Criteria and Rubric
This assignment is worth 300 points. Download this rubric and carefully read it to understand the expectations.
Assignment 1 Grading Criteria Maximum Points Researched the history and current issues surrounding liability in policing in relation to Officer Newbie’s handling of the situation with White and Green; evaluated the potential risk for a lawsuit and evaluated how the use of force was applied in this situation; suggested a new policy. 44 Compared the Centervale Police Department’s use-of-force policy with the facts of the Green case. 44 Explained how Green’s behavior, the facts of the case (i.e., dispatch: fight with weapons) and Officer Newbie’s response align or misalign with the terms of the policy. 32 Created a mitigation action plan (MAP) containing three recommendations supported by the findings of current empirical research that might help to reduce the number of lawsuits that could be potentially filed against the Centervale Police Department. 48 Applied the definition of frivolous lawsuit to the situation with Officer Newbie’s handling of the White Case. Analyzed and discussed how a potential lawsuit filed by White against the Centervale Police Department might be perceived by the court and how the Centervale Police Department might mediate or litigate a lawsuit of this nature. 32 Created a presentation from the perspective of an internal affairs investigator, a compliance officer, or a similar official, delivering recommendations to a group or in a conference format presented to a public group or a criminal justice police policy board or a similar government panel; included an explanation that could be used by a department to add or change policy and to make high-level executive policies to reduce lawsuits. 40 Presentation components. 60 Total: 300
You will write a series of original research articles on a non-infectious, human disease/disorder/syndrome. See below for relevant dates, requirements for each article and possible topics. Do not submit a paper copy. All reports will be read/graded electronically using the anti-plagiarism website turnitin.com. LATE REPORTS WILL BE DOCKED 5 POINTS PER EACH LATE DAY! Being away for the weekend is NOT a viable excuse.
- Define your disease: Pick a disease that pertains to Human Physiology (keep away from cancer or viral and bacterial infections). Provide for me a brief overview (one page maximum-500 WORDS) of the disease. Here you might want to include history, symptoms, epidemiology, anatomy and/or basic pathophysiology. Do not pick a disorder that is very broad in scope that you cannot possibly write a one-page report on (example: heart disease). Choose your disease topic wisely. Remember you will be stuck with this disease for the next two reports! Your first report is due June 8 (20 pts).
- Pathophysiology: Next, you will write a two page report (Maximum 1000 WORDS) on the physiological or biochemical effects of your disease. What anatomical and physiological problems does your disease cause? How are these problems manifested in the symptoms? Remember this is a physiology class, not a medical course. Keep the clinical stuff out of this part of your series. Your second paper is due June 22 (40 pts).
- Treatments: Finally, you will submit a two page summary (Maximum 1000 WORDS) of the possible treatments for your disease, including drugs, physical therapy or future medical interventions. BUT remember this is a Human Physiology class so to get a good grade, I expect you to tell me how each treatment affects the pathophysiology/biochemistry of the disease. Your third paper is due July 7 (40 pts).
Grading of reports: The following rubric will be used to grade your reports:
1. Organization- The report contains an introduction, supporting body and adequate
- Insight- The report demonstrates a clear understanding of the assignment and contains logical inferences and conclusions.
- Style- The report contains no errors in spelling, grammar and correct word use.
4. Support- The report utilizes facts, background information, and experimental results
to support the conclusions drawn in your paper.
The course grader and I will evaluate your papers on your ability to communicate the information (i.e., your writing ability!). Therefore, have someone (for example, classmate, one of your friends, family members, etc.) read your paper and critique it prior to final
submission. Remember we grade on quality, not quantity. Thus, we will not read anything over the WORD limit. Final word of caution: watch out for plagiarism (i.e., do not copy from any source including the internet). If we detect ANY evidence of plagiarism (known as a Similarity Score on turnitin.com), at best, you will receive a zero on the report, and if the plagiarism is too extreme you will receive an “F” in the class (see below) and your name will be forwarded to the Vice President of Student Affairs for additional discipline. If you use quotations throughout your paper to avoid the plagiarism charge, you will still get docked for NOT writing an original report. Use you own words when writing the reports. In other words: DON’T BE LAZY.
Turnitin.com: All three reports must be analyzed for plagiarism using the website turnitin.com (you will be able to enter this site through the course’s Moodle page). We will NOT accept any submissions without being first evaluated by this website. Remember that you will have the opportunity to examine your own work for plagiarisms and fix any potential problems PRIOR to submitting it. Thus, any final submissions that we receive, we will assume that you have checked for any potential problems (in other words, you may not use the excuse that you didn’t know about problems with plagiarism).
Policy, Lawsuits, And the Mitigation Plan Dissertation
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!