PHIL 2100 Meaning of Eudaimonia According to Aristotle Questions
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
PHIL 2100 Meaning of Eudaimonia According to Aristotle Questions
Hello , i have some work to do, everything is explained below . make sure to watch the videos , and there is questions to be done as well .
After watching the videos for this week and reading chapter two from our text, please answer the following questions: As you can best describe, what did Aristotle mean by “eudaimonia”? Is
eudaimonia the same thing that people mean today when they refer to “happiness”? Why or why not? Please use at least one specific example to make your case! (Initial posts should be at
least five sentences in length .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWExd__bC7A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrvtOWEXDIQ
Week #2: Aristotle
This week we will take a look at an approach to ethical thinking known as “virtue ethics.” Virtue ethicists believe that, rather than focusing on the “rules” for right action, more of an emphasis
should be placed on developing a good character. For Virtue Ethics, the central question is not “What should I do?” but rather, “What should I be?”
As is still common practice, we will begin our discussion of virtue ethics by examining the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle (384-322 BCE). Aristotle, along with Socrates and Plato, could be
considered one of the “founding fathers” of virtue ethics – and who (among these three philosophers) gives us its most elaborate expression.
In summary, Aristotle thought of “virtues” as those character traits that allowed us to flourish as individuals and as a society –and he argues that the highest good for man is a state of being he
referred to as “eudaimonia.”
Very often virtue ethicists tend to believe that too much emphasis is placed on debating controversial issues such as abortion and capital punishment. They will note that issues such as these
are not what most people encounter on a day to day basis. While there are unwanted pregnancies, and you may occasionally be asked to vote on a referendum regarding capital punishment,
these are not the types of questions that most people have to address day after day. However, all of us are sons and daughters. Most of us will become parents ourselves. Some of us become
nurses, business owners, teachers, etc. The virtue ethicist will ask: “What are the characteristics of a “good” son or daughter? How does a “good” parent act? Basically: What would a good (or
virtuous) person do in any given situation? This is a question that the ethically reflective person is concerned with at all times.
Another motivating factor behind Virtue Ethics is the idea that – given the complexity of human life – it would be nearly impossible to formulate a set of rules that could address every possible
situation. This seems to be what other ethical theories try to do. However, Virtue Ethics says that we’re better off focusing on character: This way we can be assured that regardless of what life
throws at us, our *character* – who we *are* – will move us in the right direction!
Reading Review #2 The reading for this week will be pages 21-33 from GT.
- In Section 3 Aristotle states that “Our discussion will be adequate if it has as much clearness as the subject matter admits of, for precision is not to be sought for alike in all discussions, any more than in all the products of the crafts.” What does he mean by this?
- *Why* does Aristotle think that “happiness” is the highest good? (Keep in mind that we are using “happiness” in a different sense than how this word is typically used today.) What are the “criteria” that *lead* Aristotle to the conclusion that “happiness” (i.e. “eudaimonia”) is the highest good? (See Section 5)
- How does Aristotle argue for the idea that man must have a function? What does he conclude this function to be? (See Section 6)
- Aristotle identified *two* types of virtue, what are they? How are they distinct and how do we go about acquiring each? (See Section 8)
PHIL 2100 Meaning of Eudaimonia According to Aristotle Questions
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!