- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
NACLA Report on the Americas Analysis Dissertation
NACLA Report on the Americas Analysis Dissertation
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
NACLA Report on the Americas Analysis Dissertation
For this assignment, you are to read current news articles about Latin America from the website for the North American Congress of Latin America (NACLA) and submit three short reviews during the semester. Please submit one review per due date. Each review is to be at least 3-4 pages and each due date corresponds to a regional topic in Latin America. In your works cited page, compose your article entry in a format like this:
Emilio Godoy, “Mexico Bans Glysophate but Tolerates Other Agrochemicals,” NACLA Report on the Americas website (January 28, 2021)
I am looking for two main points of discussion. First, you should devote the first half of the report to a summary of the main points in the article that you selected.to help you to address this issue, consider some of these questions: What is the main issue being discussed? (i.e., immigration, elections, education, environment, women’s issues, crime, etc.) Who are the main personalities mentioned in the article? (i.e., Mexican president Andrés Manuel López Obrador, Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, President Biden, Vice-President Harris, Former President Trump, etc.) How does the issue affect the people of the country mentioned in the article? Does the issue have any connection with United States interests? What do you think could be the best solution to resolve this problem?
And for the second point of discussion, please analyze the article that you selected and present your point of view on the story. For example, how do you feel about the story? How did this article contribute to your understanding about modern Latin America? And what do you think about the author’s perspective on the article? How does this topic relate to contemporary political, economic or cultural themes in the United States today?
Mexico, US Foreign Policy, Border Issues and Latinx Communities
BORDER ISSUES, LATINX COMMUNITIES AND US FOREIGN POLICY:
ABOLISH ICE! FIGHTING FOR HUMANITY OVER PROFIT IN IMMIGRATION POLICY (JUNE 2019)
BIDEN’S NEW IMMIGRATION SYSTEM OVERLOOKS MEXICAN REFUGEES (JUNE 2021) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
BORDER LAND, BORDER WATER (BOOK REVIEW) (JULY 2020) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
CLOUDS AT THE BORDER: THREATENED BY THE WALL (SEPT. 2019) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
DISMANTLING ANTI-BLACKNESS TOGETHER (JUNE 2020) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
FROM LA MONTAÑA, GUERRERO TO THE BRONX: THE STORY OF VICTORIO HILARIO GUZMÁN (JAN. 2021)
FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN IN LATIN AMERICA (MAY 2021) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
IMMIGRATION NATION (FILM REVIEW) (AUG. 2020)
IMMIGRATION POLICY MUST LOOK BEYOND THE BORDER (JUNE 2021) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
LATIN AMERICAN IMMIGRANTS IN NEW YORK FACE COVID-19 CRISIS (SEPT. 2020) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
LOCAL PAPER COVERS PANDEMIC’S IMPACT IN QUEENS (JUNE 2020) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
MEETING CUBANS 4 TRUMP (OCT. 2020)
MIGRANT NETWORKS IN THE PANDEMIC (JULY 2021) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
REDUCING MIGRANTS’ LIVES TO ONE GRISLY PHOTOGRAPH (JULY 2019)
THE CASE FOR NUANCE IN IMMIGRANT STORIES (BOOK REVIEW) (SEPT. 2019) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
THE DEPORTATION MACHINE (BOOK REVIEW) (SEPT. 2020) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
THE OPPORTUNISTIC BORDER LOGIC OF THE PANDEMIC (MAY 2020) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
THE ORIGINS OF AN EARLY SCHOOL-TO-DEPORTATION PIPELINE (NOV. 2020) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
THE STAIN THAT MARDI GRAS COVERS UP: WORKER VULNERABILITY IN NEW ORLEANS (FEB. 2020)
THEY ARE CONCENTRATION CAMPS—AND THEY ARE ALSO PRISONS (JUNE 2019)
U.S. ASYLUM LAW IS A BIOPOLITICAL CRISIS (BOOK REVIEW) (JUNE 2020)
MEXICO:
23 YEARS OF IMPUNITY FOR PERPETRATORS OF ACTEAL MASSACRE (DEC. 2020) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
A LABOR SPRING FOR MEXICO’S MAQUILAS? (MARCH 2019)
A LICENSE TO POLLUTE AT FORTUNA SILVER MINES IN OAXACA (MARCH 2021) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
“A PROJECT FOR LIFE” IN MEXICO CITY (JAN. 2020) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
AMLO PUSHES AHEAD ON MILITARIZED MEGAPROJECTS (AUG. 2020) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
AMLO’S CRUMBLING PROMISE TO MIGRANTS (JULY 2019) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
EL CHAPO AND MEXICO’S DRUG WAR SPECTACLE (MARCH 2019) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
FOR MEXICO’S STRIKING UNIVERSITY WORKERS, A WAR OF ATTRITION OVER PUBLIC EDUCATION (JULY 2019)
“GREEN TIDE” REACHES MEXICO AS OAXACA DECRIMINALIZES ABORTION (OCT. 2019)
HORIZONTAL VERTIGO: A CITY CALLED MEXICO (BOOK REVIEW) (JULY 2021) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
IN MEXICO, THE THREATS AND FAILURES OF PRE-TRIAL DETENTION (JAN. 2020)
JULIÁN LEYZAOLA’S DANGEROUS PLANS FOR TIJUANA (MAY 2019) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
LÓPEZ OBRADOR’S PUBLIC ENEMY NUMBER ONE (FEB. 2019) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
MAQUILADORAS AND THE EXPLOITATION OF MIGRANTS ON THE BORDER (OCT. 2019)
MEXICAN WOMEN CALL ON GOVERNMENT TO END VIOLENCE (MARCH 2020) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
MEXICO BANS GLYSOPHATE BUT TOLERATES OTHER AGROCHEMICALS (JAN. 2021) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
MEXICO’S FRACKING IMPASSE (OCT. 2020) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
MINING CULTURE WARS ESCALATE IN OAXACA (DEC. 2019) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
ON THE COAST OF OAXACA, AFRO AND INDIGENOUS TRIBES FIGHT FOR WATER AUTONOMY (MAY 2019)
OAXACA FISHERWOMEN ORGANIZE TO PROTECT THEIR WAY OF LIFE (JUNE 2021) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
PANDEMIC INTENSIFIES WOMEN’S STRUGGLE FOR WATER IN OAXACA, MEXICO (JULY 2020)
POWER AND SPECTACLE ON MEXICO’S SOUTHERN BORDER (FEB. 2021) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
REVISITING THE BATTLE OF CULIACÁN (NOV. 2019) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
THE LEGACY OF SAMIR FLORES, ONE YEAR LATER (FEB. 2020) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
THE REBIRTH OF MEXICO’S ELECTRICAL WORKERS (FEB. 2019) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
THE SEARCH FOR ANSWERS IN MEXICO (APR. 2020) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
TODAY WE PROTEST, TOMORROW WE STRIKE (MARCH 2020) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
TRANSLATING THE FOURTH TRANSFORMATION (INTERVIEW) (APR. 2019) (LINKS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE.)
TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY BATTLEFIELDS (BOOK EXCERPT) (JULY 2019)
NACLA Report on the Americas Analysis Dissertation
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
