Muhammad Alis Tribute Organizational Pattern Speech
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Muhammad Alis Tribute Organizational Pattern Speech
You will write a Manuscript Presentation which is a speech about a tribute. (I already have the person who I want you to write about (Mohammed Ali, the boxer))
Speech of tribute – someone of notoriety and admiration (athlete, actor, humanitarian, politician, etc.)
Speech writing – creativity
General vocal ability (don’t speak too softly; articulate, etc.)
Some eye contact with audience (you read but should look up at us on occasion) *
Sign-ups will take place to discern speaking order.
You will type out a speech of tribute using the organization discussed in class. ALL parts of the speech must be evident (you will learn the rest during the next talk). You must follow all directions; most of your grade depends on your ability to use effective organization and detail.
You can have the speech in a size where you can read it (type it)
You will print and read your speech word for word
Sources are not required for this presentation.
Most of what you’ll find includes “common knowledge” details.
However, if you take anything from a published source, you will need to cite it.
Tell us who said, where it came from, and then give us the information.
“According to Rotheram and Phinney in their article ‘Children’s Ethnic Socialization,’ ethnic identity is defined as ‘one’s sense of belonging to an ethnic group and the part of one’s thinking, perceptions, feelings, and behavior due to group membership.’”
Your main points MUST BE: Origin story/rise to success; major accomplishments; humanitarianism or legacy
This presentation is not a summary of the topic’s life
You don’t need to appear formal but no hats
These presentations will feel somewhat repetitious in format because we’re learning basic organization at the same time. Presentations will be more unique later.
Topic Selection Details
Topics need to be people of notoriety and positive influence whom are worthy of a speech of tribute.
Topics need to be people who are or were alive and are more current/contemporary so as not to turn the presentation into a general, informative one.
Remember at NO POINT in the presentation will you talk about your personal feelings about the topic. I’m only have you choose people whom you admire because it’s easier for you to talk about them.
The Most Important thing is that you follow the requirements and focus on the organization of the presentation ( Outline, requirements, and an example of the introduction organization are attached)
On Privilege Reading Discussion Reflection
Begin by reading #2: On Privilege. After reading it, think about the message in the reading. Then write a one-page reflection paper. You are not required to do any research for this assignment. You are meant to think about the reading and reflect on it. Your paper should be one page (with 12-point type and reasonable spaces and margins).
I expect college level writing in your paper. Please be thoughtful and honest in your reflection paper, but avoid uncivil or inflammatory language. You should answer the following questions in your paper.
What did you think about what you read?
Do you mostly agree with the point of view expressed in the reading? If so, what are some points you agreed with?
Do you mostly disagree with the point of view expressed in the reading? If so, what are some points you disagreed with?
Muhammad Alis Tribute Speech
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!