MSN 6214 Essay on the Effectiveness of Health Information Technology
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Instructions for Assessment 1: Conduct a technology needs assessment for health information technology. Then, in a 4-5 page executive summary, describe your findings and recommendations for a new or updated telehealth solution for your business or practice environment.
Note: This course’s evaluations expand on the work you’ve already done in earlier examinations. As a result, complete the assessments in the order they are given.
Nurse leaders have an important part in the decision-making processes surrounding the procurement of health information technology, as well as any later modifications and improvements. A thorough and accurate needs assessment lays the groundwork for assessing the overall worth of various technologies that can be utilized to assist nursing and improve patient care to an organization.
The needs assessment you will do in your first assessment will allow you to build knowledge about a new or improved telehealth technology that will have an influence on nursing practice in a methodical manner. The requirements assessment also highlights any assessment work that has already been conducted as well as any gaps that need to be filled. The objectives of the needs assessment are to: 1. Identify practice gaps that must be addressed in order to improve patient care.
2. Recognize the nature and breadth of required changes, as well as the possibilities and challenges that come with them.
3. Facilitate a methodical and methodical approach to change management and implementation.
This evaluation gives you the chance to go through the needs analysis process and present your results in a way that will help you acquire senior leadership support.
Note: The rest of the evaluations in this course will be based on the results of your needs assessment.
Many diverse scenarios can be represented by telehealth technology. For example, the technology could be built to aid nurses in providing care to remote patients, such as chronic disease management. It might also be built to allow physicians to receive improved care strategies from other clinicians in another region of the country or even worldwide. Radiology readings or support in the operating room with a new procedure are examples of such care strategies.
Choose any new or enhanced telehealth technology that you would want to see adopted in your organization or practice environment for this and all other assessments. Consider what it would be like if you had access to any telehealth options that might assist your community. Imagine that executive leaders in your organization or practice setting are considering purchasing those resources in order to improve the quality of care provided to patients and allow medical and nursing staff to provide coverage for patients throughout the region.
Finally, assume that you are a nurse leader in top management who has been tasked with determining whether this acquisition will adequately address important challenges in patient care and result in better results.
To prepare for the assessment, think about your organization’s performance gaps, how results are monitored, and how telehealth technology can help enhance outcomes. Consider how you’d effectively articulate the necessity for new or improved technology to executive leaders in order to gain their support. Additionally, you might want to:
4. Read over the assessment instructions and scoring guide to make sure you understand what you’ll be doing.
5. Go over the Guiding Questions: Technology Needs Assessment [DOCX], which includes questions to think about as well as tips on how to complete the assessment successfully.
Note: Before submitting the final version of this assessment, you can send Smarthinking Tutoring whole or part of your draft needs assessment summary for comments. If you want to use this free service, keep in mind that you will receive feedback in 2448 hours.
Determine whether new or improved telehealth technology is required. In an executive summary, summarize your results and recommendations. Include any earlier assessments and gap analyses that may have been completed.
Complete the Vila Health: Technology Needs Assessment Preparation simulation. Vila Health is a virtual world that mimics a real-world health-care system. You will apply professional techniques, practice skills, and develop competencies in the many Vila Health scenarios that you can apply to your education and job. The data you collect in this scenario will assist you in completing the exam.
The requirements for the executive summary, listed below, match to the grading criteria in the Technology Needs Assessment Scoring Guide, therefore make sure to address each item. To see how your work will be evaluated, read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion. Additional considerations are included in the Guiding Questions: Technology Needs Assessment document linked above, which may be useful in completing your assessment. Also, keep in mind the standards for document structure and length, as well as providing supporting material, which are outlined below.
6. Describe the value and significance of a needs assessment.
7. Determine which major challenges in nursing care that affect patient outcomes will be addressed by the new or updated telehealth technology.
8. When using this technology, identify the safety needs and regulatory considerations.
9. Identify the patient privacy and confidentiality measures that this technology must provide.
10. Describe the impact of internal and external stakeholders, as well as end users, on the technology’s acquisition.
11. Use relevant and credible evidence to back up your assertions, arguments, findings, and suggestions.
12. Use a logically consistent and appropriate form and style to write clearly and concisely.
Format and Length of Document
13. Use the APA Style Paper Template [DOCX] to format your executive summary in APA style. You will also find an APA Style Paper Tutorial to assist you in drafting and formatting your executive summary. A title page and a references page should be included. It is not necessary to submit an abstract.
All pages have a running head.
Appropriate headers for level 1 sections.
Including the title page and references page, your executive summary should be 34 pages long.
Evidence to Back It Up
To back up your implementation plan, cite at least five credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry magazines.
Before submitting your executive summary, double-check it for flaws that could distract readers and make it harder for them to focus on the substance of your study.
Prompt for your portfolio: You can save your executive summary to your ePortfolio if you want.
Measurement of Competencies
You will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and evaluation criteria by successfully completing this assessment:
Competency 1: Evaluate the technologies that are utilized to collect patient data, inform diagnoses, and improve the quality, safety, and outcomes of care.
Describe the value and significance of a needs assessment.
When using a new or enhanced telehealth system, identify the safety standards and regulatory issues.
Competency 2: Create a strategy for integrating collaborative technologies.
Describe how internal and external stakeholders, as well as end users, might be affected by the purchase of new or enhanced telehealth technology.
Competency 3: Create a technology management strategy that improves patient care and organizational efficiency.
Determine which major challenges in nursing care that affect patient outcomes will be addressed by new or updated telehealth technologies.
Competency 4: Encourage the adoption of effective technology-use rules that preserve patient privacy and confidentiality.
Determine the patient confidentiality and privacy protections that must be addressed by any new or improved telehealth technology.
Competency 5: Communicate effectively with a variety of audiences in a format and style that is appropriate for the organization, professional, and scholarly norms.
Use relevant and credible evidence to back up assertions, arguments, conclusions, and suggestions.
Write in a logically cohesive and appropriate form and language that is clear and concise.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!