Minimization and Maximization Problems Discussion Essay
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Minimization and Maximization Problems Discussion Essay
Chapter for the week should be read prior to answering Initial Response and should reflect and reference the text and/or another research. Must include 2-3 paragraphs per question.
1.Discuss the similarities and differences between minimization and maximization problems using the graphical solution approaches of linear programming.
2.Develop your own original product mix LP problem with two constraints and two real variables. Follow the four steps to formulating LP problems on page 241. Explain the meaning of the numbers on the right-hand side of each of your constraints. Also, explain the significance of the technological coefficients.
Leeshawn- The similarities between minimization and maximization begin with the solutions graphs. Both types of problems use constraint lines to develop a solution. They both can also use corner methods to solve the graphical solution approaches to linear programming. Minimization and maximization are also similar in the fact that they both can use is profit line solutions.
The differences between maximization and minimization are as follows:
Maximization’s solutions will be in the upper right of the graph at the farthest point from zero. While, minimizations solutions will be in the bottom left of the graph, at the closest point to the zero.
Adria- There are many differences between the minimization and maximization problems. Maximization problems, once the lines have been drawn, the best choice solution will be bounded to the upper right when using the isoprofit line method. The maximum profit will have the longest distance to zero. For the minimization problems the minimum cost will be the point closest to the zero. The minimization beset solution will be located to the lower left.
For the similarities in both the minimization and the maximization problems, they will be using the the graphical approach of the LP. These graphs will be used to develop constraint line in the graph to find the region for the solution for each of the problems. The corner method can also be used for both types of problems. Although they each use a form of the isoprofit line solution, the maximization problems use the isoprofit linear solution while the minimization problems will use the isocost line solution.
dana- Let’s assume that there are two machines M1 M2 produce canvas bag and leather bag.
Capacities of machines per hour in below table.Canvas shoesLeather shoesM164M239
M1 and M2 can produce 300 and 500 units in week.
Selling price of Canvas bag is $60 and selling price of Leather bag is $90.
Consider 8 hours a day and 5 days a week.
Calculate the optimal mix of Canvas bags and Leather bags to maximize the contribution.
Let x1 be the number of units of canvas shoes produced by M1 .y1 be the number of units of leather shoes produced by M1 in a week.
X2 be the number of canvas shoes produced by M2 in a week.
Y2 be the number of Leather shoes produced by M2 in a week.
$60( X1+ X2) + $90*(Y1+ Y2) is maximum
Four steps should be followed when creating a linear programming (LP) problem. The first step is understanding the problem being face by management (Render et at., 2019, p. 7.2). For my example, I will use a fictitious example in my husband’s woodshop. Due to other business facets, my husband has a limited amount of time he can spend in his workshop weekly. This week, he wants to determine how many cutting boards and coasters to make to maximize his overall profit.
To solve this LP problem, I must determine the objective as well as its constraints (Render et at., 2019, p. 7.2). The objective is maximizing my husband’s weekly sales of homemade coasters and cutting boards. However, due to my husband’s limited available time, he can only spend 15 hours a week gluing and sanding and an additional 5 hours staining and finishing the coasters and cutting boards.
The decision variables must be determined next (Render et at., 2019, p. 7.2). The actual decisions I will make revolves around the optimal number of coasters and cutting boards to make in a week. These decision variables, coasters and cutting boards, along with the constraints will now be formulated into mathematical expressions allowing me to solve the objective (Render et at., 2019, p. 7.2).
Decision Variables: C1 (coasters) & C2 (cutting boards)
Maximizing: Profit = 15C1 + 20C2
Constraints: C1 ? 0
C2 ? 0
1C1 + 3C2 ? 15 (glue & sand)
1C1 + 1.5C2 ? 5 (stain & finish)
The numbers on the right-hand side of my constraints (bolded values) are the number of hours per week my husband can spend gluing and sanding or staining and finishing. For example, each week my husband has allotted 15 hours to gluing and sanding as it’s the most time-consuming process of woodworking. He also has an additional 5 hours allotted to stain and finish the items he created that week. Each week he can only spend so much time sanding or staining final products.
The amount of time he has allotted for each constraint has the potential to be drastically changed by technological coefficients. Changes in technological coefficients can cause the shape of the feasible region to shift, which can potentially cause a change in the optimal value (Render et at., 2019, p. 7.7). For example, if my husband purchased a new electric sander that brought the sanding time for cutting boards down to 1.5 hours, the feasible region would shift but the optimal value would remain the same.
Render, B., Stair, R. M., Hanna, M. E., & Hale, T. S. (2019). Quantitative analysis for management (13th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
Minimization and Maximization Problems Discussion Essay
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!