Medicare Sustainable Growth Rate Discussion Study Paper Dissertation

Medicare Sustainable Growth Rate Discussion Study Paper

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

Medicare Sustainable Growth Rate Discussion Study Paper

Peer 1:

In August of 1997, the historic Balanced Budget Act was signed into law. Included in that Act was the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) provision which was enacted shortly after in October of 1997. Despite being enacted to help balance the federal budget by restricting Medicare spending as it related to physician services, the policy was full of complexities and confusion (Hirsch, et al., 2016). This later led Congress to repeal SGR in 2015 as part of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act, also known as MACRA (Spivack, Laugesen, & Oberlander, 2018). There are four factors that influence the SGR target that is used to help control Medicare expenditure growth for physician services. These factors are fees for physicians’ services, the number of Medicare beneficiaries, US gross domestic product, and service expenditures based on changing law or regulations (Hirsch, et al., 2016).

Fees for Physicians’ Services

Fees for physicians’ services is one of the types of Medicare coverage. Services are given a code which in turn, the codes have an associated value or fee that a physician charges. The fees are added up and this is one way a patient is billed for payment. In 2019, 63% of Medicare coverage fell under the FFS (Fees for Service), (U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid, 2021).

Number of Medicare Beneficiaries

Medicare is a federally based insurance program that was introduced in 1965. To be eligible for Medicare, one must be either be 65 years of age or a person with a disability and those with End-Stage Renal Disease requiring dialysis or kidney transplant. In 2020, over 18% of American citizens were enrolled in the Medicare program, which equates to approximately 62.6 million people (Yang, 2021). With the aging population living longer the number of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled would be expected to increase. More people on Medicare leads to higher healthcare expenditures and resulting in a different way of delivering healthcare services.

US Gross Domestic Product

Growth Domestic Product (GDP) is the overall health of an economy. Several factors weigh in on calculating a countries GDP such as consumer spending, investments, and government spending. Typically, if the economy is doing good then the GDP will reflect growth, and on the flip side, if the economy is performing poorly, the GDP decreases. In order to have sustainability, Medicare spending cannot consistently exceed GDP.

Service Expenditures Based on Changing Law or Regulations

Government policies and regulations are a determinant of service expenditures. An example is the Affordable Care Act of 2010 that invoked certain healthcare coverage mandates that would lead to increased accessibility and affordability. The recent regulatory actions that were put in place at the onset of the pandemic increased the need for telemedicine and payments permitted across state lines. Regulations were fast-tracked so that patients can receive healthcare services and healthcare systems could receive payment.

References

Hirsch, J., Harvey, H., Barr, R., Donovan, W., Duszak, R., Nicola, G., Schaefer, P., & Manchikanti, L. (2016). Sustainable Growth Rate Repealed, MACRA Revealed: Historical Context and Analysis of Recent Changes in Medicare Physician Payment Methodologies. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 37(2), 210-214. https://doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4522

Spivack, S., Laugesen, M., and Oberlander, J. (2018). The Politics and Policy of Health Reform No Permanent Fix: MACRA, MIPS, and the Politics of Physician Payment Reform. Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law, 43(6), 1025-1040. https://doi.org.exproxy.umgc.edu/10.1215/03616878-…

Peer 2:

As stated in the reading, the two Medicare physician payment methodologies, known as merit based incentive payment system and the APM, the MACRA allowed for more switches to value based care systems in the healthcare industry. Beneficiaries are allotted more quality service and access through this change, while avoiding the cutting of physician spending.

Implementing a Value-based care mode into virtually all healthcare practices would help in decreasing unnecessary spending while simultaneously improving patient care. Traditionally, in the field of healthcare, patient services were paid for through fee-for-service. Value-based models aim to reward outcomes while also limiting spending. Value- based care models are centered around patient treatment and have a goal to reduce hospital readmissions, improve preventative care methods, and use state of the art healthcare technologies (Vogenburg, 2019). Although value-based care is more effective, there hasn’t been a strong push to completely transition from volume-based care methods. So far, value-Based models have been implemented in Kaiser Permanente, the Cleveland Clinic and Geisinger Health system (Vogenburg, 2019)

Value-based care models will decrease cost, improve quality and continue to improve patient access. Value-based care models focus on helping patients recover from their illnesses and injuries more quickly and seek to find the root of the issue. In return, patients do not have to attend frequent doctor’s visits or receive invasive procedures. From a pharmaceutical standpoint, they will also  spend less money on prescription medications, as time goes on. Overall, implementing this model will benefit both patients and providers.

Reference:

J.A. Hirsch, H.B. Harvey, R.M. Barr, W.D. Donovan, R. Duszak, G.N. Nicola, P.W. Schaefer and L. Manchikanti. American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2016,  37 (2) 210-214; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4522

Vogenberg, F. R. (2019). US Healthcare Trends and Contradictions in 2019. American Health & Drug Benefits, 12(1), 40–47.

Medicare Sustainable Growth Rate Discussion Study Paper

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.

GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER

CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow

Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!