Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness-Based Addiction Treatment

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness-Based Addiction Treatment

Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness-Based Addiction Treatment versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Usual Care for Smoking Cessation

Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness-Based Addiction Treatment

Claire Adams Spears1, Donald Hedeker2, Liang Li3, Cai Wu3, Natalie K. Anderson4, Sean C. Houchins4, Christine Vinci5, Diana Stewart Hoover3, Jennifer Irvin Vidrine6, Paul M. Cinciripini3, Andrew J. Waters7, and David W.

Wetter8

Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness-Based Addiction Treatment

1Georgia State University School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA

Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness-Based Addiction Treatment

2The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness-Based Addiction Treatment

3The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness-Based Addiction Treatment

4The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC

Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness-Based Addiction Treatment

5Rice University, Houston, TX

Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness-Based Addiction Treatment

6Stephenson Cancer Center and The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK

Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness-Based Addiction Treatment

7Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Washington, DC

Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness-Based Addiction Treatment

8University of Utah and the Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT

Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness-Based Addiction Treatment

Abstract

Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness-Based Addiction Treatment

Objective—To examine cognitive and affective mechanisms underlying Mindfulness-Based Addiction Treatment (MBAT) versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Usual Care (UC)

 

for smoking cessation.

 

Method—Participants in the parent study from which data were drawn (N = 412; 54.9% female; 48.2% African-American, 41.5% non-Latino White, 5.4% Latino, 4.9% other; 57.6% annual

 

income < $30,000) were randomized to MBAT (n = 154), CBT (n = 155), or UC (n = 103). From quit date through 26 weeks post-quit, participants completed measures of emotions, craving,

 

dependence, withdrawal, self-efficacy, and attentional bias. Biochemically-confirmed 7-day

 

smoking abstinence was assessed at 4 and 26 weeks post-quit. Although the parent study did not

 

find a significant treatment effect on abstinence, mixed-effects regression models were conducted

 

to examine treatment effects on hypothesized mechanisms, and indirect effects of treatments on

 

abstinence were tested.

 

Results—Participants receiving MBAT perceived greater volitional control over smoking and evidenced lower volatility of anger than participants in both other treatments. However, there were

 

no other significant differences between MBAT and CBT. Compared to those receiving UC,

 

MBAT participants reported lower anxiety, concentration difficulties, craving, and dependence, as

 

Corresponding Author: Claire Adams Spears, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Division of Health Promotion & Behavior, School of Public Health, Georgia State University; cspears@gsu.edu; Phone: 404.413.9335.

 

HHS Public Access Author manuscript J Consult Clin Psychol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2018 November 01.

 

Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 November ; 85(11): 1029–1040. doi:10.1037/ccp0000229.

 

Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness-Based Addiction Treatment

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.

GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER

CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow

Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness-Based Addiction Treatment

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!