Marx Economic Philosophic Manuscripts Summary
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Marx Economic Philosophic Manuscripts Summary
Applied Philosophy (200XP)
Format: Writing
Many people tend to think that philosophy is an abstract field of knowledge that is not limited by the real world. However, a lot of philosophy deals with the concrete material world. The applied philosophy assignment requires students to apply the theoretical texts we covered this semester to the real world. What can X’s philosophy reveal about the contemporary world? Why is X’s philosophy relevant to today’s problems? In what ways?
How to get full XP for the assignment:
1 Pick a philosophical text/idea we covered.
2 Briefly summarize said philosophical text/idea
3 Research a contemporary concrete question, event, invention, etc… that is relevant to our world situation – your question can be anything (about the elections, democracy, colonizing mars, designing babies, the nature of beauty, whether anti-vaxxers are reasonable etc….), the only requirement is that it must be relevant to our contemporary life (no questions about the distant future or past).
4 Explain the context behind your question by utilizing resources like journal or news-paper articles.
5 Explain how the selected philosophy helps us understand the philosophical elements behind your selected situation. – “How does philosopher “P” help us understand the complicated nature and depth of this question?”
OR
Use the philosophy to argue for a specific answer or solution to your concrete situation – “How does Philosopher “P”, help us conclude that “X””
Close Reading (300XP)
Format: Writing
A close reading is the reverse of a summary. While a summary is a shorter representation of the overall text, a close reading is a larger representation of a specific part of a text. You must do a close reading of a text assigned in class.
Your close reading must:
1 Select a passage (phrase or paragraph) in a text. The passage must be at the top of the page.
2 Explain what the passage means by relating it to the main thesis of the text.
3 Detail the argument that supports the selected passage.
4 Explain the importance of the passage and how it fits and operates within the larger text.
5 Define any key concept of ideas that are either in the passage or needed to explain the passage.
6 Provide an analysis of the passage.
Nehamas, Alexander. “Meno’s Paradox and Socrates as a Teacher.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, no. 3, 1985, pp. 1–30., doi:10.4324/9780203401552-16.
In this article, Nehamas discusses the Learner’s paradox found in Plato’s Meno. They specifically are looking to figure out the philosophical importance of Meno’s paradox. While many readers of Plato have posited that Meno is a stubborn character who exists only to provide Plato a platform for his theory of the Forms, Nehamas wants to argue that Meno’s concerns (namely the learner’s paradox) is a truly important and philosophically relevant issue within Plato’s view of Knowledge. If we see Meno’s objection to Socrates as philosophically relevant, then Nehamas argues, “we shall be able to connect this passage with certain other issues, some of which were of considerable importance in Plato’s philosophical thinking.” (Nehamas, 2)
Summary (250XP)
Format: Writing
Straightforwardly speaking, a summary is a shortened version of an original text. Your summary should be at least a full page single spaced and must present every major point and key concept in a text. Your summary should also detail every premise of a philosopher’s argument and explain how they lead to their particular conclusion. Do not stray away from the text or add any information that is not in the text. The point of a summary is to 1) make the text easier to read and 2) make it easier to understand. While summarizing is a kind of copying, it must be an original piece (i.e., you are not allowed to steal from the original text or from other people’s summaries – although quoting is allowed).
Marx Economic Philosophic Manuscripts Summary
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THE PROFESSIONAL ESSAY CUSTOMIZED FOR YOUY NOW – CLICK NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!