- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
Major Factor Contributing to Nonvoting
Major Factor Contributing to Nonvoting
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Major Factor Contributing to Nonvoting
36 A major factor contributing to nonvoting is:
A. high income.
B. partisanship.
C. reduction of barriers to voting.
D. political alienation.
37 The best predictor of how a person will vote is his or her:
A. education.
B. income.
C. occupation.
D. party identification.
38 The “emerging Democratic majority” as defined by Teixeira and Judis includes:
A. minorities.
B. young people.
C. those with college degrees.
D. A, B, and C are correct.
39 The ‘typical’ Democratic voter:
A. supports limited government.
B. supports civil rights.
C. is a corporate CEO.
D. favors fundamentalist Christian social positions.
40 The Whig party joined others to form the __________ Party.
A. Republican
B. Democratic Republican
C. Federalist
D. Socialist
Task (To be done– the following 6 questions)
What is an Information Systems Strategy? Provide an example in your explanation. (4 marks)
2. Explain some of the hidden costs of poor user interface design. (6 marks)
3. Discuss the USDP lifecycle with diagram(s). (10 marks)
4. Distinguish between generalization and specialization. Provide an example of each. (4 marks)
5. What are the purposes of activity diagrams? (8 marks)
6. Define the term ‘Use case’. Provide an example using a use case diagram. (4 marks)
RationaleThis assessment tasks covers the fundamental concepts of object modeling and activities of SDLC. More specifically it assess your ability to
• Explain the concepts of object orientation methodology (Learning outcome 1);
• Describe the activities in each phase of the system development life cycle. (Learning Outcome 2)
Marking criteria
Criteria HD DI CR PS FL Question 1. Comprehensive explanation with an example of Information Systems Strategy. Detailed explanation with an incomplete example. List and explain the main purposes with an unexplained example. Listing of the main purposes of Information Systems Strategy without an example and explanation. Inadequate or incomplete explanation of Information Systems Strategy. No example provided. Question 1. Possible marks 4 3.5 3.0 2 – 2.5 0 – 1 Question 2 Explained 3 examples of hidden cost of poor UI and its immediate effects and a complete explanation of consequences. Explained 3 examples of hidden cost of poor UI and its immediate effects and incomplete explanation of consequences. Explained 3 examples of hidden cost of poor UI and its immediate effects and no explanation of consequences. List 3 examples of hidden cost of poor UI, with no explanation, no immediate effects and no explanation of consequences. List less than 3 examples of hidden costs, with no explanation of consequences, and no examples. Question 2. Possible marks 6 5 4 3 0 – 2.5 Question 3. Complete and clear description of USDP using a complete diagram. Use at least 1 reference correctly in APA. Detailed description of USDP with an adequate diagram. Has no reference or reference is not in APA. Thorough explanation of USDP with a correct diagram. Has no reference or reference is not in APA. Incomplete explanation of USDP, with an incomplete diagram, and no reference. Incomplete explanation with no diagram and no reference. Question 3. Possible marks 10 8 6 5 0-4 Question 4. Complete and clear comparison between generalization and specialization with a good example of each. Defined and compared specialization and generalization with only 1 example. Defined and compared specialization and generalization. Has not provided an example of each. Defined both generalization and specialization with no comparison and no example. List definition of generalization or specialization with no comparison and no example. Question 4. Possible marks 4 3 2.5 2 0-1 Question 5. Clear and complete explanation of 4 purposes. List all 4 purposes with clear explanation of at most 3 purposes. List 4 purposes with explanation for at most 2 purposes. List 4 purposes with no explanation. List less than 4 purposes, with no explanation. Question 5. Possible marks 8 6 5 4 0-3 Question 6. Complete definition with a clear example. Complete definition with
a good example but has an incorrect use of UC diagram.Clear definition with incomplete example and an incorrect use of UC diagram. Adequate definition with no example. Incomplete definition with no example. Question 6.
Possible marks4 3 2.5 2 0-1.5
Presentation
Reports should be submitted is MS Word format, using the CSU referencing style of APA.
Major Factor Contributing to Nonvoting
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
