- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
LX 2918 Managing Humanitarian Logistics Discussion
LX 2918 Managing Humanitarian Logistics Discussion
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
LX 2918 Managing Humanitarian Logistics Discussion
Review the Transportation Research News Report, August 2013. (Found in Course Documents).
This is a long document that you can review later, but focus on pages 11-17 addressing Humanitarian Relief and Broken Supply Chains. There are 7 key topics in this section. ?
Pick one area and briefly explain its impact- positive or negative- as it relates to relief and supply chains. If you can find a disaster to support your position, that would be great.?
here t2 different answers just paprahrase from them
Answer 1 #
When it comes to humanitarian logistics, achieving best practices continues to be a challenge. Humanitarian supply chains lag behind the private sector in technology implementation, best practices, and operating efficiency (Menzies & Helferich, 2013). Due to the lack of overall funding, and humanitarian logistics decision makers not recognizing newly introduced tools and approaches, achieving best practices continues to impact relief and supply chains. In comparison to commercial networks that are profit motivated, humanitarian networks provide essential services to disaster-affected individuals. As a result, the supply chains of commercial networks which focus on cost-effective measures, such as automation, streamlining, outsourcing, performance measurements, and so forth, outperform their counterpart in humanitarian networks.
Implementing technological advances, such has blockchain technology can have a positive impact on relief efforts and supply chains. Blockchain could speed supply procurement, better coordinate transportation and improve recordkeeping (Guillot, 2018). The devastating effect of Hurricane Katrina on New Orleans and the 2010 Haiti earthquake were logistical nightmares. Getting food, water, and other supplies to the storm-ravaged areas required coordination and logistical planning. Unfortunately, the lack of organization, coordination between government agencies and contractors created a chaotic environment.
Blockchain, a record-keeping mechanism that makes it easier and safer for businesses to work together over the internet can be utilized by humanitarian logistics to achieve best practices. As a distributed database that holds tamper-resistant records of digital data or events that several users may concurrently access, inspect, or add to, it provides a transparent system that can easily track all types of transactions within the supply chain. The original information stays put, leaving a permanent and public information trail, or chain of transactions (Vorabutra, 2016). This function is advantageous to disaster management for record keeping and review purposes.
In 2005, the U.S. government’s failure to prepare and respond to Katrina’s destruction was incessantly criticized. With blockchain technology, in preparation for hurricanes, humanitarian logistics can utilize the system and match disaster locations with appropriate vendors for relief chains. Once the disaster strikes, smart contracts (digital contracts) would automatically trigger orders and initiate the supply chain. Electronic devices that track warehouse freights to the truck’s final destination provides transparency and efficiency (Guillot, 2018).
The 7.0 magnitude earthquake that struck Haiti in 2010 is considered one of the direst humanitarian catastrophes of all time. Within 24 hours, more than 20 nations and non-governmental organizations were on the move to provide disaster relief that ranged from recovery operations and medical support to distribution of food and water. However, due to the absences of a common communication channel and the use of too many unstructured data sources, such as email and social media, it hindered collaboration and efficiency. With the usage of blockchain technology, the UN, national humanitarian aid, NGOs, and other organizations would be able to connect via a distributed network. This results in (1) distributed power – where all parties are equally entitled and can continue to use their resource planning system, (2) partner interoperability – the blockchain provides a single source of truth for all operations that are updated in real time (every part can access the transaction history), (3) ad hoc capabilities – parties can join or leave the network at any time, and (4) privacy – parties keep their data sovereignty and don’t have to expose their resource capacities to other participants (Rohr, 2017).
“Although advances in humanitarian logistics cannot be achieved by adopting the best commercial practices” (Menzies & Helferich, 2013), achieving best practices through collaboration and the utilization of standardized technology can have a positive impact. The use of blockchain technology is just one example that can expedite disaster relief.
Answer #2
It is evident during the event of supplying critical goods required to assist those who are affected by disasters; there are a lot of challenges that face the delivery. When the goods and services are not delivered at the right time in the scenes that leads to failure in effective response of the disaster. The humanitarian logistics require proper planning for the mitigation, detection, response, and recovery in a disaster. The logistics are known to account for 60% to 80 % of expenditure. It is evident that all those involved in the relief operation are connected by relatively fragile supply chains.
There are challenging facing with the supply chain of humanitarian relief. One challenge is to create a flexible and adaptive supply chain in the upcoming uncertain world. The supply networks are known to be more complex and vulnerable. There has also been an acceleration of rate in the advancement of the technology that has introduced unprecedented and unanticipated opportunities to interfere with human life. Another challenge is the issue of global power shifts and conflicts that generate new threats to humanitarian logistics (James, 2017). Such issues have raised more weaknesses in the humanitarian supply chain such. There are also various challenges being faced by organizations that are inadequate finances, ambiguous objectives, limited resources, high uncertainty, extreme urgency and political boundaries.
The business best practices are also experiencing changes. Those changes are causing hardship to the commercial supply chains. Most of the organization develop plans to protect themselves against low impact and recurrent risks and fail to plan on high impact low likelihood risks. The commercial supply chains are the ones used by humanitarian organizations, and they end up failing them terribly (Santos & Howard, 2017). The commercials supply chain fail to recognize the high impacts that are caused by low likelihood risks. Such risks need to be realized by the commercial suppliers for them to be held accountable in case they fail in their operation of supplying the goods and services required by the humanitarian organizations.
It is essential to understand there must be plans set to counter the adverse effects brought by those challenges in the supply of goods and services. There are steps to be followed when the humanitarian logistics have to be accomplished. The humanitarian logistic relief engages in five phases that are planning, mitigation, detection, response, and recovery (James, 2017). There are steps for each phase. In the planning, there is the implementation of the relief plan. During mitigation, there is the establishment of a continuous improvement process.
An example of a disaster that has recently occurred in the United States is the hurricane that occurred on October 2, 2017. The hurricane happened in Florida and Puerto Rico that claimed the lives of 5,740 people. There was a power crisis since the hurricane knocked down the entire power grid that resulted in a total blackout in the areas. The hurricane was named as hurricane Maria. The response to the hurricane disaster was not up to the standards since various challenges faced it and this could have led to the high number of deaths witnessed (Santos & Howard, 2017). The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s proved not to be prepared to handle the disaster in advance. They failed to send goods and services to the scene in time. The challenges were poor management of the resources they had for the disaster.
The lack of resources was because FEMA failed to plan adequately for the food and fresh water that was needed in case of such occurrence. Getting to the islands was also a challenge that they never planned for in advance. The response showed that there was a chaotic and disorganized relief effort on the islands and logistical problems occupied the response.
References
James, E. (2017). Prelims – Managing Humanitarian Relief. Managing Humanitarian Relief – 2nd Edition, i-xxxii. doi:10.3362/9781780449029.000
Santos, A. R., & Howard, J. T. (2017). Estimates of excess deaths in Puerto Rico following Hurricane Maria. doi:10.31235/osf.io/s7dmu
LX 2918 Managing Humanitarian Logistics Discussion
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
