Literature Review Assignment Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Literature Review Assignment Essay
A literature review is a descriptive summary of research on a topic that has previously been studied. The purpose of a literature review is to inform readers of the significant knowledge and ideas that have been established on a topic. Its purpose is to compare, contrast and/or connect findings that were identified when reviewing researchers’ work. Oftentimes, literature reviews are written to ground a study in a particular context of what is known about a subject in order to establish a foundation for the topic (or question) being researched.
The purpose of this assignment is to facilitate your abilities to research a topic of study so you can learn to:
(1) identify and formulate a research question that defines what you’d like to learn
(2) apply your knowledge on reading research that you’ve learned in class
(3) analyze information found in academic journal articles and popular sources
(4) synthesize new knowledge into a written small-scale literature review
For this assignment, you are asked to complete a small-scale literature review on a sociological topic of your choice. Locate at least 3 resources (2 peer-reviewed journal articles from the social sciences and 1 popular source) on your topic and write a 2 -3 page literature review selected (minimum 700 words not including references). The paper should use APA citation format, be doubled-spaced, and font size of 11 or 12 using Times or Calibri. You should use the ACT-UP criteria to assess popular sources.
Steps to complete your small-scale literature review:
- Choose a sociological topic that you are interested in studying.
- Formulate a research question that specifically describes what would like to know about your topic.
- Use the library resources (library database, research appointment with a librarian, etc.) and other online sources (google, blogs, etc.) to search for and locate resources that include your topic’s information.
- Find articles, read the abstracts and skim them to determine if they correspond well to your topic AND research question.
- Select at least 2 peer-reviewed journal articles and download them for your project.
- Read your articles and begin to sort and classify them according to their findings.
- Organize your sources by sorting and classifying their findings in a meaningful way, always considering your original topic and research question.
- Write an outline for your literature review, seek feedback (tutor.com, librarian, professor, etc.)
- Write your review.
Outline for writing your small-scale literature review:
The introduction is used to establish the context of your review to the reader. To establish the context, it is important to do the following in this opening paragraph:
- Define the topic of your study and provide any background information that helps your reader to understand the topic.
- Explain your reason (perspective) for reviewing the literature on this topic.
- State your research question for this review.
This section of your paper begins with an explanation of how you have organized your literature review and describes findings from sources that provide answers to your research question. Before you begin this section, be sure that you have sorted your sources into different themes based on their findings (sometimes called results). After you sort your sources, it is important to give your sorted groups a descriptive name. The names of the sorted sources will become your headings for each of the paragraphs that you write in the body of your review. To write the body of your literature review, it is important to include the following:
- Write an introduction paragraph for the body of your review. This paragraph tells the reader specific information on how many articles you reviewed and how you sorted the articles into common themes based on the findings (results).
- This will be a paragraph that describes the first theme that you identified and compare, contrast, and/or connect the sources you’ve selected.
- Optional – This will be a paragraph that describes the second theme that you identified and compare, contrast, and/or connect the sources you’ve selected.
- Optional – This will be a paragraph that describes the third theme that you identified and compare, contrast, and/or connect the sources you’ve selected.
This is the last paragraph of your literature review. In this paragraph, it is important to summarize the main findings from the sources that you reviewed and to point out the information that you found particularly important to know that answered the research question that you established in the first paragraph of your review. Try to conclude your paper by connecting your research question back to the context of the general topic of study.
This is the last page of your review. It serves as a listing of all references that you mentioned in your paper. Please use APA style when completing this list.
Literature Review Assignment
The following chart will be used as a rubric to grade your small-scale literature review:
Target Acceptable Unacceptable Research Question
The research question was well established in the broader context of a social justice topic.
The research question was established in the context of a social justice topic. The research question was not established in the context of a social justice topic. Content
At least three (3) articles were selected and each specifically related to the initial research question. One peer-reviewed article was selected from a social sciences journal e.g. Social Problems. At least two (2) articles were selected and related to the initial research question. One peer-reviewed article was selected from a social sciences journal e.g. Social Problems. At least one article was selected or articles minimally related to the research question. Peer-reviewed articles not included or none from a social sciences journal e.g. Social Problems. The findings/results of articles were thoughtfully compared, contrasted, and/or connected to each other. The findings of articles were compared, contrasted, and/or connected to each other. The findings of articles were mentioned with little and or no comparison or connection to each other. The conclusion of the review summarized the knowledge found from this review and related the knowledge gain to the research question. The conclusion of the review summarized the knowledge found from this review. The conclusion of the review did not summarize the knowledge found from this review. APA References
The references were cited using APA style. The references were listed but not cited using a specific citation style (APA). The references were not listed. Organization
The review was organized using subheadings. The review was suitably organized considering the contents of the selected articles. Spacing and formatting adheres to guidelines. The review was suitably organized considering the contents of the selected articles. Spacing and formatting adheres to guidelines. The review was minimally organized, and writing was difficult to follow throughout. Spacing and formatting did not adhere to guidelines. Mechanics
There were no grammatical, spelling, and/or punctuation errors, and transitional phrases were used to guide the reader throughout the text. There was an occasional grammatical, spelling, and/or punctuation error that did not distract the reader. There were many grammatical, spelling, and/or punctuation errors that distracted the reader from the content of the writing.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!