LAW 121 Internet Domain Names Questions Dissertation
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
LAW 121 Internet Domain Names Questions Dissertation
1.Describe the process for obtaining internet domain names and the procedure for arbitrating internet domain name disputes.
2.Define license and the parties to a licensing agreement.
3.What conduct is prohibited under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act? Give four examples of data that is protected by the act and explain what the criminal penalties are for violation of the act.
4.When can corporations be held criminally liable? Can corporate officers and directors be held liable for crimes that they did not participate in or know about?
5.What is a trade secret? What must the owner of a trade secret do to protect it? What must he prove if he sues someone for misappropriation of his trade secret and what can he recover if he wins the suit?
6.List and describe the kinds of marks that can be protected. What features qualify it for protection and what kind of marks cannot be protected?
7.List and describe/distinguish the kinds of intellectual property that can be protected by patents, copyrights and trademarks and tell how long each type of protection lasts
8.Describe the purpose and major features of the Electronic Signature in Global and National Commerce Act.
9.Explain the difference between a bilateral and a unilateral contract and give an example of each.
10.What is the doctrine of quasi contract and when would it be applied?
11.Explain the difference between valid, void, voidable and unenforceable contracts.
12.List and describe the four main elements necessary to form a contract and the two defenses to the enforcement of a contract.
13.List and describe in detail the three requirements of an effective offer.
14.List and discuss the four ways an offer can be terminated by the operation of law.
- When can silence count as acceptance of an offer? Give detail.
16.Explain and distinguish the concepts of preexisting duty and past consideration and give examples.
17.Explain whether illegal contracts are enforceable.
18.What is the doctrine of promissory estoppel and when does it apply?
19.Discuss illusory promises, gratuitous promises and moral obligation promises.
20.What is consideration? Describe its two elements. Do courts look at whether or not consideration is adequate?
- Discuss licensing statutes and the effect they have on contracts made by an unlicensed person. Distinguish between regulatory licensing statutes and revenue raising licensing statutes.
22.What is the doctrine of unconscionability, what kind of situations will it apply to, and what must a plaintiff prove to establish that a clause or contract is unconscionable?
23.Discuss the concepts of disaffirmance and ratification of contracts by minors.
24.Discuss the law regarding contracts made with mentally incompetent and intoxicated persons.
25.What is “intellectual property” and why is it hard to protect?
27.What is the Economic Espionage Act and what is its purpose?
28.What is “dilution” of a trademark and why is this issue so important to a trademark owner?
29.Discuss the difference between an express contract, an implied in fact contract and an implied in law contract.
- What are the four situations in which a court will consider a contract to be unclear or ambiguous? What rules guide a court in interpreting an ambiguous contract?
- LAW 121 Internet Domain Names Questions Dissertation
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!