- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- academicperfect@gmail.com
Landfill On Sea and Politics of Climate Change Article Paper
Landfill On Sea and Politics of Climate Change Article Paper
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Landfill On Sea and Politics of Climate Change Article Paper
Assignments include both questions and essay related with the both articles covered and the ideas discussed in the course notes. Additional research might be needed for the essay. Please make sure you provide references for the essay.
You need to review both article and lecture notes to answer the following questions. Few questions may require reviewing related on-line short video clips.
Article 25: Landfill-on-Sea.
Why in an ocean environment similar to landfill, biodegradable plastic will remain intact? Damage to wildlife and ecosystems?
As related in the article “Landfill-on-Sea,” what sort of evidence have the Algalita researchers discovered to show that small pieces of plastic in the ocean are being mistaken for food at all levels of the chain?
As concluded in the article “Landfill-on-Sea,” how effective will biodegradable plastic be in the effort to stop polluting the earth with non-degrading plastic?
What would you offer as a short-term and long-term solution to clean up major Great Pacific Garbage Patch that is almost equivalent to the size of Texas?
Article 28: How to stop climate change: The Easy Way.
As proposed in “How to Stop Climate Change: The Easy Way,” what does the author cite as “a big win-win” in the tropics, and how and why does he suggest it be accomplished? Explain it briefly.
As discussed in the article “How to Stop Climate Change: The Easy Way,” explain what are the objectives of Robert Socolow and Stephen Pacala of Princeton University for their concept of “stabilization wedges” and give at least one example to illustrate it. Do you think, stabilization wedges can be accomplished in short-term?
Briefly compare and contrast nuclear and coal-fired power plants in terms of features that which one would damage more the environment?
Essay: Based on a major Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, on Feb 3, 2007 New York Times article titled “Science Panel Calls Global Warming ‘Unequivocal’ by E. Rosenthal and A. Revkin” concluded for the first time that Global Warming (GW) is “unequivocal” and that human activity is the main driver, “very likely” causing most of the rise in temperatures since 1950.
The author of the article describes that there are three steps of strategy for stopping climate change: (1) Stop debating, start doing; (2) Focus on the big wins; and (3) Use Technology. Investigate if this strategy would work to stop or even to reduce the impacts of climate change. Provide examples on stopping/reducing climate change practices from real-life applications that people may adopt to their daily lives.
Also, I am assuming that you want to leave a perfect gift to your lovely children and grandchildren. As part of energy conservation and being more energy efficient American with less consumption habits, what would really do in your daily lives? You should list and briefly describe at least three practices that YOU WILL “HONESTLY” TRY TO IMPLEMENT for the rest of your professional life that may help reduce carbon foot print and impact your life and environment positively.
Landfill On Sea and Politics of Climate Change Article Paper
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THE PROFESSIONAL ESSAY CUSTOMIZED FOR YOUY NOW – CLICK NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
