Lack of drug screening in the workplace
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Lack of drug screening in the workplace
Drug screening in the workplace is a process by which employers test employees and job applicants for the presence of drugs in their system. This practice has become increasingly common in many industries, particularly those that involve safety-sensitive positions, such as transportation, construction, and healthcare. However, there are still many workplaces where drug screening is not mandatory, and this can lead to a range of negative consequences for both employers and employees.
One of the primary reasons for drug screening in the workplace is safety. Workers who are under the influence of drugs or alcohol can pose a significant risk to themselves and their coworkers. For example, a construction worker who is high on drugs may operate heavy machinery in an unsafe manner, while a truck driver who is under the influence of drugs or alcohol may cause a serious accident. By implementing drug screening programs, employers can identify employees who may be under the influence of drugs or alcohol and take appropriate action to prevent accidents and injuries.
Another reason for drug screening in the workplace is productivity. Employees who abuse drugs or alcohol may be more likely to miss work or be late, leading to decreased productivity and increased costs for the employer. By identifying employees who are struggling with substance abuse, employers can offer them support and resources to help them address their issues and get back on track.
Drug screening in the workplace can also have positive effects on employee health and well-being. Employees who are struggling with substance abuse may not be aware of the impact that their drug use is having on their health and may not seek treatment without intervention. By identifying employees who are struggling with substance abuse, employers can offer them resources and support to help them get the help they need to recover.
Despite the potential benefits of drug screening in the workplace, there are some concerns and criticisms of this practice. One of the most significant criticisms is that drug testing can be invasive and may violate employees’ privacy rights. Additionally, drug testing can sometimes lead to false positives or false negatives, which can result in unfair treatment for employees. There is also a concern that drug testing can be discriminatory, particularly if certain groups of employees are targeted for testing more frequently than others.
To address these concerns, employers can implement drug testing policies that are fair, non-discriminatory, and respectful of employees’ privacy rights. This can include implementing drug testing programs that are random, rather than targeting specific groups of employees, and providing support and resources for employees who are struggling with substance abuse.
In conclusion, drug screening in the workplace can have a range of benefits for employers and employees, including increased safety, productivity, and employee health and well-being. While there are some concerns and criticisms of this practice, these can be addressed by implementing fair and non-discriminatory drug testing policies that respect employees’ privacy rights. By prioritizing the safety and well-being of all employees, employers can create a work environment that is both safe and supportive, and help their employees to achieve their full potential.
Lack of drug screening in the workplace
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!