Labor Market and Legal Environment Dissertation
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Labor Market and Legal Environment Dissertation
You work for a HR consulting company and an organization (just like the one in which you currently work, have worked, or have access to) has hired your firm to conduct
an HRM analysis and make recommendations to better align HR practices to the key business initiatives of the company. In order to accomplish the goal:
- Analyze the organization and develop a set of HRM practices based upon textbook illustrations and figures. You will develop an 8-10 page research paper (not
including the title and reference pages) modeling one or more of the illustrations from the course text. Your paper should also:
Identify the firm’s history, strategy, market position, and specific area of alignment.
Provide job pricing and compensation package.
Describe and analyze the current and targeted work processes as well as the respective knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) required to achieve the organization’s objectives.
Incorporate a discussion of relevant technology considerations to achieve work output in the context of the organization’s goals.
Provide a discussion of the labor market and the appropriate labor law context. Identification of companies that are preparing to address the changes.
Prescribe a set of HRM recommendations, specifically tailored for the selected firm, consisting of choices from the 19 dimensions of an HRM system presented in Chapter 3 of the course text.
Describe other HRM issues as applicable.
Week One: Organization identification, history, industry, and definition of business strategy
Week Two: Key employee behaviors and KSAs appropriate for work class
Week Three: Technology factors and organizational design of work processes
Week Four: Labor market and legal environment
Week Five: Draft of HRM practices
Week Six: Final 8-10 page paper
RESPOND TO DISCUSSION RESPONSE ACCORDINGLY (150 WORDS EACH)
KM1. I would opt for the experimental treatment. I chose this option knowing there is a 40% chance I die right away. Considering I only have 5 years to live if I do nothing I want the probability of the positive outcome to be greater than my current expected life time and it is; (0.6)(20)= 12years. Accounting for the 40% chance I die, I subtract the 5 years I would lose times the probability from 12 years. 12years – (0.4)
(5) = 10years. Ten years is a lot longer than five years so I will take that chance.
KM2. We would be better off yet if we waited out the treatment a few more years. Say we live normally for another 3 years and then go in for the experimental treatment. That is if the 20 additional years are still valid and at a 60% probability after 3 years. Assuming our health doesn’t get worse and the treatment is still expected to add 20 years with a 60% chance of success, the chose is a no brainier at that point.
Considering we have less than 2 years to live without it. So again positive outcome = (0.60)(20) = 12years. Negative outcome = (0.4)(2) = 0.8years. Therefore the net outcome is 12 – 0.8 = 11.2years and should be the figure used against the remaining 2 years when deciding.
SM3. We use the median to describe an entire set of observations with a single value representing the center of the data. Half of the observations are above the median, half are below it. It is determined by ranking the data and finding observation number [N + 1] / 2. If there are an even number of observations, the median is extrapolated as the value midway between that of observation numbers N / 2 and [N / 2]
TH4. There are a lot of if’s in the argument but then there were ifs in the original choice. There are a number of variables to be considered when making the choice. My question is the success and failure rate of the initial findings. Were they all the same age, gender, and health? Even with percentages to support the success and failure there are still a lot of other variables to take into account. As stated, the strides
in medicine may provide additional options. More percentages to factor in. With almost every choice you have a different set of probabilities to look at that all factor into the original decision. What are my odds of being in a car crash while driving to the Dr.s office. You can put numbers on almost everything.
EH5. My wife was diagnosed with a form of cancer 12 years ago. Things are stable and she is fine. but when we first heard the diagnosis we were in shock. We asked the doctor, “How long does she have?” His astute answer was , “How well does she drive?”
You’re correct, though, that there are many variables that need to be considered. There is an aspect of statistics which deals with how well the sample population represents the target population. Age, gender, medical history, genetics, nationality — and the list goes on — could all influence the success or failure of a medical procedure.
SM6. Medical experiments as a whole is nothing but total risk. Participants will have to evaluate the negatives and the positives. But most of the time the positives out weigh the negatives like in this scenario. Weighing the 40% negative and the 60%
SM2 7. We use the median to describe an entire set of observations with a single value representing the center of the data. Half of the observations are above the median, half are below it. It is determined by ranking the data and finding observation number [N + 1] / 2. If there are an even number of observations, the median is extrapolated as the value midway between that of observation numbers N / 2 and [N / 2] + 1.
Labor Market and Legal Environment Dissertation
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!