April 13, 2022

JUS255 Final Project: Training PowerPoint for Police Officers

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

JUS255 Final Project: Training PowerPoint for Police Officers

Pretend you are a Police Academy instructor who needs to develop a PowerPoint presentation for police officers on an emerging technology that addresses a long-standing police issue. Your choice of topics is as follow:

Video Recording of Police-Citizen Encounters/Body Cameras (Ch.15)
Video Recording of Police Interrogations (Ch.15)
Less-Lethal Use of Force Devices for Crowd Control (Ch.18 & 21)
Less-Lethal Use of Force Devices for Emotionally-Disturbed Individuals (Ch.18 & 21)
Vehicle Pursuits (Ch.18 & 21)
Gunfire Reduction Technology, e.g, ShotSpotter (Ch.18)
Problem Officers & Early Warning Systems (Ch.19)
Electronic Monitoring of Probationers and Parolees (Ch.21)
Facial Recognition Technology (Ch.21)

Begin by reading the relevant sections of your textbook, but don’t be limited by what is covered; there have been great technological advances since the book was published. For example there was a recent TED Talk and study conducted on the biases in facial recognition software. The presentation should address the following questions:

What does the new technology do?
Why is it needed? What long-standing police issue does this technology address?
How was the problem handled up to this point?
How does the technology work? (Don’t get too technical.)
What are its strengths?
What are its weaknesses, risks, or unintended consequences?

At a minimum , the presentation should be 10 slides with at least 4 sources.

EACH SLIDE MUST CONTAIN THE CITATION FOR EACH SOURCE OF INFORMATION OR GRAPHIC USED IN THE SLIDE. For instance, if you use information from the textbook/OCR, you would follow it with (Foster, 2005). If you are showing a picture of a Taser, you might follow it with (https://glenngohr.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/taser.jpg). If you are using information from an online article on Tasers, you might follow the information with (http://edition.cnn.com/2015/04/14/us/taser-gun-confusion/ ). Remember to fully list them alphabetically in the reference list on the last slide, such as: Foster, R. (2005). Police Technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

HONESTY ALERT: DON’T PUFF UP YOUR REFERENCE LIST WITH SOURCES YOU DON’T ACTUALLY USE IN THE POWERPOINT PRESENTATION. EVERY SOURCE CITED IN A SLIDE SHOULD APPEAR IN THE REFERENCE LIST, AND VICE VERSA.

A good PowerPoint does NOT use whole paragraphs or even entire sentences, since it is intended to accompany a speaker who explains what’s on the screen. Slides typically move too quickly for viewers to read long text, or long lists of items. So, use short lists of bulleted or numbered phrases, in outline format, to present key ideas.

To get RELIABLE sources of information, you must use the LIBRARY DATABASES as opposed to a Google search, since anyone can post biased, self-serving falsehoods on the Internet. An example of a misleading web posting might be a “scientific study” on the safety of Tasers, posted by the Taser manufacturer. Even a professional magazine like “Police Chief” may carry articles deceptively written by advertisers, so check authors’ backgrounds.

To use the Library Databases, first go to the Library Tab in Blackboard. Click on Database Subject List. Under Electronic Resources click on Criminal Justice Periodicals. This takes you to the Proquest. Then type in your topic. You’ll get a list of articles, starting with the most current.

If you use the database Proquest, and find a good article, you can click on the “Cite this” feature at the top of the page – it will show you the article cited in APA format. You may copy and paste the citation onto your References List (Bibliography) on your last slide.

DON’T CITE & DON’T TRUST WIKIPEDIA , since anyone with an “agenda” can change the text at any moment. Look at the Grading Rubric below to make sure you requirements of this assignment

GRADING RUBRIC FOR JUS 255 POLICE TECHNOLOGY POWERPOINT PRESENTATION
GRADING CRITERIA	HOW RATED
Is the presentation focused on one of the topics? Video Recording of Police-Citizen Encounters/Body Cameras (Ch.15) Video Recording of Police Interrogations (Ch.15) Less-Lethal Use of Force Devices for Crowd Control (Ch.18 & 21) Less-Lethal Use of Force Devices for Emotionally-Disturbed Individuals (Ch.18 & 21) Vehicle Pursuits (Ch.18 & 21) Gunfire Reduction Technology, e.g, ShotSpotter (Ch.18) Problem Officers & Early Warning Systems (Ch.19) Electronic Monitoring of Probationers and Parolees (Ch.21) Facial Recognition Technology (Ch.21)	If not, Project will not be accepted.
Does the presentation plagiarize or copy-and-paste without attribution?	If so, Project will not be accepted.
Does the presentation address each question? A. What does the new technology do? B. Why is it needed? What long-standing police issue does this technology address? C. How was the problem handled up to this point? D. How does the technology work? (Don’t get too technical.) E. What are its strengths? F. What are its weaknesses, risks, or unintended consequences?	10 POINTS FOR EACH ANSWERED QUESTION (60 POINTS TOTAL)
Are the slides written in short, clear phrases?	1 TO 6 POINTS
Do each slide have enough, but not too much information?	1 TO 6 POINTS
Are at least 4 good, reliable references used?	1 TO 6 POINTS
Are the references appropriately cited each slide?	1 TO 6 POINTS
Is the presentation visually attractive and interesting? Does it effectively use graphics, color, layout, and fonts, without looking too cluttered?	1 TO 6 POINTS
Overall, is the PowerPoint an effective training tool for an audience of police officers?	1 TO 10 POINTS

RUBRIC

QUALITY OF RESPONSE	NO RESPONSE	POOR / UNSATISFACTORY	SATISFACTORY	GOOD	EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)	Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.	20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.	30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.	40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.	50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).	Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.	5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6^th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.	10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6^th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.	15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6^th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.	20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6^th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)	Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.	5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors	10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors	15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.	20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)	Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.	3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6^th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6^th edition requirements whatsoever.	5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6^th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper	7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.	10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6^th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.

GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER

CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow

Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

1 1

JUS255 Final Project: Training PowerPoint for Police Officers

Simply Easy Learning

JUS255 Final Project: Training PowerPoint for Police Officers

JUS255 Final Project: Training PowerPoint for Police Officers

Description/Paper Instructions

GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER

CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

admin

Related posts

Evaluated the International Internship Program

WBS Using Principles Of Project Scheduling And Budgeting

WBS Using Principles Of Project Scheduling And Budgeting

Leave a Reply Cancel reply