Interaction of Members of Groups Leadership Discussion Dissertation
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Interaction of Members of Groups Leadership Discussion Dissertation
You will be required to write 200–250-word replies to at least 3 of your classmates’ threads. In your replies, expand on the discussion by analyzing and building upon the thread and incorporating at least 1 scholarly reference in each reply. Integration of Scripture is encouraged, but is not required. Assertions must be supported by in-text references in current APA format. Use first person and single-spaced formatting and indent new paragraphs. Your threads and replies must be well written, well organized, and focused.
Which of the different skills addressed by Jacobs et al. and Corey et al described and demonstrated different leadership skills during this week’s reading? As I reflect on my own leadership style, I ask myself which of the skills described in this week’s reading will be easy and which will be difficult to incorporate into my own leadership style. I will say my biggest opportunities for growth will be active listening and mini -lecturing and information giving, as it reflects my own leadership style (Jacobs, Schimmel, Masson, & Harvill, 2016). Based on my DISC assessment (personality test) I am a very expressive, meaning I enjoy voicing my opinion (Carbonell, 2011). Sometimes that can get in the way of allowing others to share while I actively listen. Mini – lecturing will be an issue as well, because my strong Alpha may take over the group. However, my dominate and inspiring personality trait allows me to master use of voice, identifying allies and modeling and self-disclosure. This is true as it relates to my leadership style, because people recognize my seemingly natural leadership skills. I stand out because of my confidence and optimism. I am sought after to take charge and make things happen. I am often viewed as a successful person because of my ability to direct and influence others. (Carbonell, p137, 2011). As a person grows as a leader they will evolve and use different styles over time. Obedience, power, and status can impact the leaders and members of a group. Power and status can affect how a member interacts with the leader. The way a member views their leader will determine the skills needed, as discussed in Jacob’s books. Being obedient and disciplined also plays a part in the success of the group. The leader must maintain order, so that the group functions in a way that everyone benefits from it.
Carbonell, M. How To Solve The People Puzzle. [MBS Direct]. Retrieved
Jacobs, E. E., Schimmel, C. J., Masson, R. L., & Harvill, R. L. (2016). Group counseling:
Strategies and skills.
Group Leadership Skills
As I read the assigned readings this week, I made the determination that I am mainly a transactional leader. I can see some emerging skills within myself in regards to transformational skills, but more experience and training is needed (Forsyth, 2019). A transactional leader is skilled in recognizing achievements, providing direction and feedback for the group, defining expectations, negotiating for resources, supervising, and intervening when appropriate (Jacobs, Schimmel, Masson, & Harvill, 2016). I have some work to do as I focus on improving my group leading skills to that of a transformational level. Some difficulties include challenging members with high standards as I attempt to inspire others. This is a difficult aspect for me as I am so used to just barely keeping my head above water and I have the tendency to project that feeling as we attempt to accomplish tasks as a group. I enjoy engaging with people on an individual level (a characteristic of an ideal transformational leader) but I feel I lack the energy necessary to develop and coach people beyond that (Forsyth, 2019).
In the readings, we learn optimal attributes for an effective group leader. Some skills that come easy to me include active listening, clarification and questioning, linking, mini-lecturing, tone-setting, encouraging/ supporting and modeling/ self-disclosure (Jacobs, Schimmel, Masson, & Harvill, 2016). Personally, I find it very enjoyable to identify even the smallest improvements and victories and encourage those around me. In a group setting, I enjoy reading the body language of the members in an effort to further the conversation and set an affable tone. Digging down to the heart of the matter is fun for me, a hobby of sorts, and clarifying the main issue comes easily to me. We have all been blessed with gifts from God and I believe, at this stage in my life, I should be able to identify a few of those gifts.
Some skills that are not a natural thing for me and need continued sharpening include the skill of reflecting, summarizing, identifying allies, and developing a keener sense of multicultural understanding. In reference to reflecting, I just plain forget to do it. I like to move forward and reflection happens in my mind, but my lips forget to voice it. Reflection is extremely important in order to keep the entire group on the same page while also allowing the individual member to feel that he/ she is being understood accurately (Jacobs, Schimmel, Masson, & Harvill, 2016).
Summarizing is in the same vein as reflection as specific details are pulled from the speaker’s points in an effort to focus the group on the same raised concern. This does not come easily for me on the outside of my brain- but it is happening inside- I just forget to voice it and give the credit to the speaker. I tend to see the issue and run with it, all by myself. It would be an exercise in cohesion if I could learn to voice the great points made by group members and give them the credit for allowing the group to dig deeper.
Multicultural competence is, I believe, an ever changing skill which will always need revisiting and continued education. We can always know more than we do about the cultures, taboos, and acceptable norms for all of God’s children. Just acknowledging the fact that the group is inherently different from one another while at the same time being inherently similar as children of God- bound together in love and a desire to understand, a group can build upon that foundation and become ultimately effective.
Forsyth, D. (2019). Group dynamics (7th ed.). Cengage Learning Inc,. Boston, MA.
Jacobs, E., Schimmel, C., Masson, R., Harvill, R. (2016). Group counseling: Skills and strategies (8th ed.). Cengage Learning, Boston, MA.
Leading Group Sessions
Groups are known to prosper with a positive leadership influence. In general, people prefer to be led than to be leaderless, which leads to promoting the group-level process that evaluates members who have inherent characteristics of either task or relationship-motivated leadership skills (Forsyth, 2019). The emergence of leaders can be determined by identifying traits in an individual that are likely suitable to move the group forward towards common goals. Traits such as expertise, mental and emotional intelligence, creativity, conscientiousness, organized, self-controlled, achievement-oriented, and comfort or willingness to speak are common and desirable leadership competencies (Forsyth, 2019).
Sometimes leaders are moved forward by a group simply due to unchallenged bias such as the way someone looks. The implicit leadership theory (ILT) states that individuals in groups may be unaware of what drives their actions towards or away from leadership candidates. Group members are more likely to be acting upon preconceived ideas of leadership qualities that are believed to produce successful outcomes for the issue at hand (Forsyth, 2019).
I have a democratic relationship-motivated leadership style stemming from my personality that presents confidently and relies on emotional intelligence when navigating and motivating groups. I use keen perception to link member commonalities while managing tone, energy, and pace (Jacobs et al., 2106). Active listening, using reflection and clarification, encouraging, and relaying pertinent information are observable skills needed for leading a group. More subtle skills such as the use of the eyes, tone of voice, energy, and self-disclosure as a means of modeling are powerful group influencers initiated by the leader (Jacobs et al., 2106).
The most effortless group skills based on my leadership style promote a connection between members and the leader, so it is no surprise that the most challenging skill is in confronting, which identifies the error of an individual’s action causes isolation rather than promoting inclusion. Although I do not have a problem confronting people one on one, I have yet to learn how to confront in a group setting effectively.
A democratic relationship-motivated leadership style promotes an agreed-upon “obedience” to leadership direction allotted by the groups endorsing power and status given to their leader(s). Of course, not all groups function well in this format, particularly when goals are mandated, such as in the case of an anger management learning group. The democratic group likely relies on referent leadership power based on mutual respect, but a more structured approach is likely needed with resistant participants (Forsyth, 2019).
A court-appointed group leader would demonstrate a legitimate expert power stance to provide the structure needed to engage resistant group members. A hierarchical structure is likely to evoke more obedience; therefore, a court-appointed group leader would demonstrate status by exhibiting behaviors that signal deference and submissiveness (Forsyth, 2019).
Forsyth, D. R. (2019). Group dynamics (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage. ISBN: 97811337408851.
Jacobs, E. E., Schimmel, C. J., Masson, R. L., & Harvill, R. L. (2016). Group counseling: Strategies and skills (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage. ISBN: 9781305087309.
Interaction of Members of Groups Leadership Discussion Dissertation
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!